Spiritater wrote:Step One.
You beat the Cobblers at home
grufti wrote:Have we ever played the Cobbers?
Martin Shaw wrote:goal line technology will be in place for both legs, as it was against Newport 3 years ago.
Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:Martin Shaw wrote:goal line technology will be in place for both legs, as it was against Newport 3 years ago.
Knowing our luck it will work against us this time
Martin Shaw wrote:goal line technology will be in place for both legs, as it was against Newport 3 years ago.
Martin Shaw wrote:Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:Martin Shaw wrote:goal line technology will be in place for both legs, as it was against Newport 3 years ago.
Knowing our luck it will work against us this time
that would be ironic after the Carlisle and Swindon games. That said, no-one can complain more about injustices than Northampton after last weekend.
Martin Shaw wrote:A 17 year old, who looked about 12, in goal, whose attempts to save the goals was feeble. When they had a decent experienced keeper on the bench. One of the other 17 year olds who played was released on Monday. So what was the point of that other than putting out as weak a side as possible?
Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:Martin Shaw wrote:A 17 year old, who looked about 12, in goal, whose attempts to save the goals was feeble. When they had a decent experienced keeper on the bench. One of the other 17 year olds who played was released on Monday. So what was the point of that other than putting out as weak a side as possible?
Or were they giving the 17 year old the chance to earn a contract?
Martin Shaw wrote:A 17 year old, who looked about 12, in goal, whose attempts to save the goals was feeble. When they had a decent experienced keeper on the bench. One of the other 17 year olds who played was released on Monday. So what was the point of that other than putting out as weak a side as possible?
Sedgwick wrote:Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:Martin Shaw wrote:A 17 year old, who looked about 12, in goal, whose attempts to save the goals was feeble. When they had a decent experienced keeper on the bench. One of the other 17 year olds who played was released on Monday. So what was the point of that other than putting out as weak a side as possible?
Or were they giving the 17 year old the chance to earn a contract?
With one game? I highly doubt it.
Agree on the keeper, it was like someone had told him to try and let the ball go in
Martin Shaw wrote:A 17 year old, who looked about 12, in goal, whose attempts to save the goals was feeble. When they had a decent experienced keeper on the bench. One of the other 17 year olds who played was released on Monday. So what was the point of that other than putting out as weak a side as possible?
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 174 guests