DoomMerchant wrote:I might add about Sutton United - what a weird football team. Ninth in the league, still a very creditable chance of making the playoffs, coming to a side blowing out of it's arse both in man-power and confidence.........AND THEY PLAY FOR A DRAW whilst hoping to nick a goal.
Wasting time when they could quite easily up a gear and go for a three points for a promotion push.
I hated them before yesterday but because of that crappy mindset they've concreted themselves firmly in to a select group of my least favourite 'football' teams. Horrible.
Showaddywaddy wrote:Sneag wrote:PEAR CIDER wrote:Sneag wrote:Absolute turd of a performance.
Great to see a timewasting substitution when you need to grab a winner.
You might as well play Flinders upfront ahead of Johnson, he's stealing a wage.
Chased down every loose balll, and got jack raspberries service.
Don't let facts get in the way of a witch hunt though
You clearly have a hard on for a player that doesn't want to be here. Each to their own.
He barely broke sweat. I remember him giving one of their centre halves a nudge to win us a throw in and a ball into their box from Akins that he made nothing of. James Gale’s performance totally put Johnson to shame today, fantastic work rate and desire to try and push forward. DJ ambled from one centre half to another when they had possession with no intent to put them under pressure. The service was indeed cack but the difference between the effort of Gale and Johnson was quite frankly an embarrassment.
victor A block wrote:Showaddywaddy wrote:Sneag wrote:PEAR CIDER wrote:Sneag wrote:Absolute turd of a performance.
Great to see a timewasting substitution when you need to grab a winner.
You might as well play Flinders upfront ahead of Johnson, he's stealing a wage.
Chased down every loose balll, and got jack raspberries service.
Don't let facts get in the way of a witch hunt though
You clearly have a hard on for a player that doesn't want to be here. Each to their own.
He barely broke sweat. I remember him giving one of their centre halves a nudge to win us a throw in and a ball into their box from Akins that he made nothing of. James Gale’s performance totally put Johnson to shame today, fantastic work rate and desire to try and push forward. DJ ambled from one centre half to another when they had possession with no intent to put them under pressure. The service was indeed cack but the difference between the effort of Gale and Johnson was quite frankly an embarrassment.
Johnson clearly getting no service at all. Gale used his debut to give a 100% performance full of enthusiasm but resembled a headless chicken chasing around. The net effect of either on the game and therefore difference was zero.
Chrisuknottm wrote:Dave Wayne wrote:yorkshire stag wrote:The One wrote:Pym was poor today rooted to his line again for the cross that got
Harbottle injured and his kicking was woeful
said it all season, never commands his box, don’t rate him sorry
Irrespective of what Pym did at that point, unless I am mistaken, the reason Harbottle was injured was due to their thug centre half leading with his elbow. He got up fairly quickly, saw the state of Harbottle, and fell to the ground faking a head injury to avoid a card. He took it far enough to actually accept treatment and a 'Rambo style' headband which he disposed of within minutes.
I had the same view as this and thought he intentionally deflected any repercussion by going down, however I would say in mitigation that there didnt seem to be any howls of protest nor flare ups from the Stags players demanding the referee take action.
stagtastic1 wrote:Chrisuknottm wrote:Dave Wayne wrote:yorkshire stag wrote:The One wrote:Pym was poor today rooted to his line again for the cross that got
Harbottle injured and his kicking was woeful
said it all season, never commands his box, don’t rate him sorry
Irrespective of what Pym did at that point, unless I am mistaken, the reason Harbottle was injured was due to their thug centre half leading with his elbow. He got up fairly quickly, saw the state of Harbottle, and fell to the ground faking a head injury to avoid a card. He took it far enough to actually accept treatment and a 'Rambo style' headband which he disposed of within minutes.
I had the same view as this and thought he intentionally deflected any repercussion by going down, however I would say in mitigation that there didnt seem to be any howls of protest nor flare ups from the Stags players demanding the referee take action.
In my opinion I think the reason there was little reaction by our players was down to the fact that the challenge came in as the majority had stopped looking in the belief that the ball was going out of play so their full attention was not on the incident. There was also the concern for Harbottle lying motionless on the ground.
With regards to their player I totally agree that his actions were to deflect from his horrendous challenge. Surely if someone is able to stand up, then collapses to the ground they are suffering from concussion and should automatically have to go off, not have an assessment which deemed him fit to continue. His headband (bandage) was another farce as, has been mentioned, came off within minutes. As far as I could see there was no blood on either it nor the players head and his ability to run about and pass a ball wasn’t affected.
Sutton are a physical team that get away with a lot but if referees took action sooner it would nullify that tactic.
Yes we didn’t create yesterday but all our creative midfielders are out injured or suspended, the ones we had left are defensive and creativity doesn’t come easily to them.
We will have to hope these missing players are back sooner rather than later.
I would like to think they were booing the opposition for their negative approach to the game. However, I realise for some, that sadly is not the case.MTFCMusings wrote:The injury situation is clearly hampering our ability to be a creative force, and I have some sympathy for Clough that all our midfielders capable of passing the ball are injured at the same time.
The problem for Clough is that a number of times in the past he has said he is happy to use any member of the squad at any time and it not make the team significantly weaker, or at least that is the line when we are winning. When we’re not winning, that suddenly changes to we’re not able to win games without our best players.
I appreciate he was probably just attempting to keep morale high yesterday, but saying things like he thought ‘we played alright’ and ‘we tried to keep the ball down and play as much as we could’ just don’t reflect the game we all saw.
For the first time in a while yesterday I thought the atmosphere was pretty flat, there were more shouts from the crowd as to their dissatisfaction with the team and there were audible boos at the final whistle, most likely borne out of frustration.
adamstag wrote:The top 6 all play each other next weekend.
Maybe if we might break into a sweat and stop producing miserable performances and win next week we’d be right back in the playoff picture.
bear 73 wrote:I do agree that a draw was not the result that was wanted, but teams coming to the one call are not here to entertain but to frustrate.
Any player showing Quality or skill would be a target for their hatchet men.
Sutton played the player not the ball Obstruction, late tackles and making the game stop start.
They are a very physical team.
If the ref had been strict the yellow cards would have come sooner, and would have curtailed their antics, and we might have had more football being played.
A week ref is their opportunity to kick and bully the opponents.
I thought it was great credit to the players to stand up and be counted and mix it with them.
Allowing late tackles will always stop the talented players that is why red and yellow cards were introduced. so the ref could have more influence on the game.
Two clean sheets is always a platform to build from but harder when Harbottle and Hewitt are battered around the head
Marky Mark wrote:I’d be amazed if there was more than 20 minutes of actual play in each half yesterday, Sutton were extremely effective at what they do. Spending all day getting a foot to the ball breaking things up, wasting time, kicking the ball away, going to ground easily - we need to be smarter.
I’m a Quinn fanboy but you can see we have zero creativity down the left when he’s not playing - for a team that attacks down the flanks and gets crosses in his absence is a massive hole. Idiot that he is. They also doubled up on Akins whenever he got into the final third to prevent crosses coming in from that side, they knew what they were doing.
Rob wrote:Marky Mark wrote:I’d be amazed if there was more than 20 minutes of actual play in each half yesterday, Sutton were extremely effective at what they do. Spending all day getting a foot to the ball breaking things up, wasting time, kicking the ball away, going to ground easily - we need to be smarter.
I’m a Quinn fanboy but you can see we have zero creativity down the left when he’s not playing - for a team that attacks down the flanks and gets crosses in his absence is a massive hole. Idiot that he is. They also doubled up on Akins whenever he got into the final third to prevent crosses coming in from that side, they knew what they were doing.
We'd have either won the game or finished with ten men had Quinny played, but we really do miss him. At least he's back for Sat, which is a must win. Maybe Reed with a weeks training will start too.
Billy the fish wrote:Mid table security beckons
Rob wrote:Marky Mark wrote:I’d be amazed if there was more than 20 minutes of actual play in each half yesterday, Sutton were extremely effective at what they do. Spending all day getting a foot to the ball breaking things up, wasting time, kicking the ball away, going to ground easily - we need to be smarter. I thought Oates for Johnson was a change that should have been made, and earlier than Oates came on - we needed some pace up there, we weren’t going to go through them so needed to get behind them, Gale was looking for the pass when he dropped deep but it’s not DJs game and he hasn’t necessarily got the pace to be beating players to a through ball 30-40 yards out.
I’m a Quinn fanboy but you can see we have zero creativity down the left when he’s not playing - for a team that attacks down the flanks and gets crosses in his absence is a massive hole. Idiot that he is. They also doubled up on Akins whenever he got into the final third to prevent crosses coming in from that side, they knew what they were doing.
We'd have either won the game or finished with ten men had Quinny played, but we really do miss him. At least he's back for Sat, which is a must win. Maybe Reed with a weeks training will start too.
bellwhiff wrote:five to three wrote:Gale working hard. DJ nowhere. No instinct and no presence. Would be interesting to see Gale and Oates.
I can’t go for that, no can do.
Rob wrote:Marky Mark wrote:I’d be amazed if there was more than 20 minutes of actual play in each half yesterday, Sutton were extremely effective at what they do. Spending all day getting a foot to the ball breaking things up, wasting time, kicking the ball away, going to ground easily - we need to be smarter.
I’m a Quinn fanboy but you can see we have zero creativity down the left when he’s not playing - for a team that attacks down the flanks and gets crosses in his absence is a massive hole. Idiot that he is. They also doubled up on Akins whenever he got into the final third to prevent crosses coming in from that side, they knew what they were doing.
We'd have either won the game or finished with ten men had Quinny played, but we really do miss him. At least he's back for Sat, which is a must win. Maybe Reed with a weeks training will start too.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 135 guests