Dan wrote:I hope nigel remembers to play a goalkeeper
Fair Dan. I did think that when I typed it and thought someone on it would spot that
Dan wrote:I hope nigel remembers to play a goalkeeper
NEStag wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:NEStag wrote:Sounded like Nigel thought Johnson was ready but maybe not Kilgour
I am going to guess
McLaughlin (if fit)
Hewitt
Perch
Johnson
Gordon
Maris
Quinn
Boateng
Akins
Oates
I thought the other way round, with some doubt whether Johnson registered in time rather than not being ready.
Fair point. Although I thought he sounded optimistic on that front in the interview
NEStag wrote:I thought he let slip he was playing a back 4 and then quickly tried to correct it
BH_Stag wrote:Both would start for me as long as cleared to play. Not like we are flying and it would upset things. Only 5 teams in the league have conceded less than us and these are the lads we’ve brought in to sort it so get them in from the off and let’s get moving.
Ethers1979 wrote:BH_Stag wrote:Both would start for me as long as cleared to play. Not like we are flying and it would upset things. Only 5 teams in the league have conceded less than us and these are the lads we’ve brought in to sort it so get them in from the off and let’s get moving.
We have the 6th best defence? What’s all the fuss about?
Ethers1979 wrote:BH_Stag wrote:Both would start for me as long as cleared to play. Not like we are flying and it would upset things. Only 5 teams in the league have conceded less than us and these are the lads we’ve brought in to sort it so get them in from the off and let’s get moving.
We have the 6th best defence? What’s all the fuss about?
gazza1988 wrote:Crewe are the 2nd lowest goalscorers in the league with just 19 goals scored. Joint 11th best in the league on goals conceded.
gazza1988 wrote:Ethers1979 wrote:BH_Stag wrote:Both would start for me as long as cleared to play. Not like we are flying and it would upset things. Only 5 teams in the league have conceded less than us and these are the lads we’ve brought in to sort it so get them in from the off and let’s get moving.
We have the 6th best defence? What’s all the fuss about?
They got the stat wrong.
5 teams have conceded more than us on 34. Doncaster have 35 (currently 10th in the table), Rochdale have 37 (22nd), Harrogate have 39 (19th), Crawley have 39 (21st) and Hartlepool have the worst with 45 (23rd)
Now on goals scored we are joint 4th best with Stevenage(2nd) in the league with 35. Orient(1st) are 3rd best and have scored 36, Carlisle(4th) are 2nd best with 37 and Northampton(3rd) are highest scorers with 40.
Reaffirms my view that we don't need strikers, we need defenders to stop the goals being conceded so easily. Left back is still a major need and ideally another CB preferably left footed if beggars can be choosers.
That solid foundation at the back would see us attack more often because we can depend on defenders defending.
Marky Mark wrote:gazza1988 wrote:Ethers1979 wrote:BH_Stag wrote:Both would start for me as long as cleared to play. Not like we are flying and it would upset things. Only 5 teams in the league have conceded less than us and these are the lads we’ve brought in to sort it so get them in from the off and let’s get moving.
We have the 6th best defence? What’s all the fuss about?
They got the stat wrong.
5 teams have conceded more than us on 34. Doncaster have 35 (currently 10th in the table), Rochdale have 37 (22nd), Harrogate have 39 (19th), Crawley have 39 (21st) and Hartlepool have the worst with 45 (23rd)
Now on goals scored we are joint 4th best with Stevenage(2nd) in the league with 35. Orient(1st) are 3rd best and have scored 36, Carlisle(4th) are 2nd best with 37 and Northampton(3rd) are highest scorers with 40.
Reaffirms my view that we don't need strikers, we need defenders to stop the goals being conceded so easily. Left back is still a major need and ideally another CB preferably left footed if beggars can be choosers.
That solid foundation at the back would see us attack more often because we can depend on defenders defending.
The numbers are so clear: We've had the joint 2nd highest shots from open play in League 2 as well (219 shots from open play, 23 goals) - joint with Salford (219/22) and Stockport (219/24), everyone is way behind Swindon (249/22). So we're alright with the goals and chances - however, with our 2nd highest scorer about to leave then there is going to be a hole in the numbers.
The defensive numbers bear your point out: We've had the joint 4th lowest shots against us from open play but conceded the joint 3rd most goals (164 shots against/26 goals). We basically concede a goal from every 6 shots against us. Only Hartlepool are worse. Stevenage are the highest, conceding a goal from every 16 shots.
Pos, Team, Shots against, Goals Against, Goal every shot
23, Hartlepool United, 211, 36, 6
9, Mansfield Town, 164, 26, 6
12, Sutton United, 173, 23, 8
10, Doncaster Rovers, 232, 29, 8
24, Gillingham, 179, 21, 9
19, Harrogate Town, 236, 26, 9
6, Barrow, 174, 19, 9
4, Carlisle United, 207, 21, 10
16, Grimsby, 178, 18, 10
20, Colchester United, 215, 21, 10
14, Stockport, 164, 16, 10
22, Rochdale, 200, 19, 11
11, Walsall, 187, 16, 12
15, Tranmere Rovers, 164, 14, 12
21, Crawley Town, 248, 21, 12
8, Swindon Town, 208, 17, 12
3, Northampton Town, 189, 15, 13
7, Salford City, 195, 15, 13
17, Crewe Alexandra, 223, 17, 13
18, Newport County, 195, 14, 14
13, AFC Wimbledon, 178, 12, 15
1, Leyton Orient, 138, 9, 15
5, Bradford City, 159, 10, 16
2, Stevenage, 148, 9, 16
Marky Mark wrote:I know the XG measure has some ridicule (sometimes rightly), but in this case it's relevant because it's a measure of likelihood of scoring from the position that shots are taken from. We have the third lowest XG against, but one of the highest actual goals against - which suggests that teams are scoring against us from more difficult positions on the pitch - this could be worldies, but maybe goals from angles/tight positions. Our XG goals against is 0.19 - which is the 3rd lowest in League 2.
So: we have one of the lowest shots against (actual shots), an even lower XG's against (shots from which position on the pitch), but concede one of highest goals per shot ratio (actual goals). It says to me that we're conceding worldies, or that goals are being conceded from shots from tighter positions.
part time pete wrote:Marky Mark wrote:I know the XG measure has some ridicule (sometimes rightly), but in this case it's relevant because it's a measure of likelihood of scoring from the position that shots are taken from. We have the third lowest XG against, but one of the highest actual goals against - which suggests that teams are scoring against us from more difficult positions on the pitch - this could be worldies, but maybe goals from angles/tight positions. Our XG goals against is 0.19 - which is the 3rd lowest in League 2.
So: we have one of the lowest shots against (actual shots), an even lower XG's against (shots from which position on the pitch), but concede one of highest goals per shot ratio (actual goals). It says to me that we're conceding worldies, or that goals are being conceded from shots from tighter positions.
So who’s fault is it?
Marky Mark wrote:part time pete wrote:Marky Mark wrote:I know the XG measure has some ridicule (sometimes rightly), but in this case it's relevant because it's a measure of likelihood of scoring from the position that shots are taken from. We have the third lowest XG against, but one of the highest actual goals against - which suggests that teams are scoring against us from more difficult positions on the pitch - this could be worldies, but maybe goals from angles/tight positions. Our XG goals against is 0.19 - which is the 3rd lowest in League 2.
So: we have one of the lowest shots against (actual shots), an even lower XG's against (shots from which position on the pitch), but concede one of highest goals per shot ratio (actual goals). It says to me that we're conceding worldies, or that goals are being conceded from shots from tighter positions.
So who’s fault is it?
If it's tighter positions, then maybe the full backs, if it's worldies then maybe the midfield/CBs aren't closing down enough, and ultimately the keeper is in the goal to stop goals.
part time pete wrote:Marky Mark wrote:gazza1988 wrote:Ethers1979 wrote:BH_Stag wrote:Both would start for me as long as cleared to play. Not like we are flying and it would upset things. Only 5 teams in the league have conceded less than us and these are the lads we’ve brought in to sort it so get them in from the off and let’s get moving.
We have the 6th best defence? What’s all the fuss about?
They got the stat wrong.
5 teams have conceded more than us on 34. Doncaster have 35 (currently 10th in the table), Rochdale have 37 (22nd), Harrogate have 39 (19th), Crawley have 39 (21st) and Hartlepool have the worst with 45 (23rd)
Now on goals scored we are joint 4th best with Stevenage(2nd) in the league with 35. Orient(1st) are 3rd best and have scored 36, Carlisle(4th) are 2nd best with 37 and Northampton(3rd) are highest scorers with 40.
Reaffirms my view that we don't need strikers, we need defenders to stop the goals being conceded so easily. Left back is still a major need and ideally another CB preferably left footed if beggars can be choosers.
That solid foundation at the back would see us attack more often because we can depend on defenders defending.
The numbers are so clear: We've had the joint 2nd highest shots from open play in League 2 as well (219 shots from open play, 23 goals) - joint with Salford (219/22) and Stockport (219/24), everyone is way behind Swindon (249/22). So we're alright with the goals and chances - however, with our 2nd highest scorer about to leave then there is going to be a hole in the numbers.
The defensive numbers bear your point out: We've had the joint 4th lowest shots against us from open play but conceded the joint 3rd most goals (164 shots against/26 goals). We basically concede a goal from every 6 shots against us. Only Hartlepool are worse. Stevenage are the highest, conceding a goal from every 16 shots.
Pos, Team, Shots against, Goals Against, Goal every shot
23, Hartlepool United, 211, 36, 6
9, Mansfield Town, 164, 26, 6
12, Sutton United, 173, 23, 8
10, Doncaster Rovers, 232, 29, 8
24, Gillingham, 179, 21, 9
19, Harrogate Town, 236, 26, 9
6, Barrow, 174, 19, 9
4, Carlisle United, 207, 21, 10
16, Grimsby, 178, 18, 10
20, Colchester United, 215, 21, 10
14, Stockport, 164, 16, 10
22, Rochdale, 200, 19, 11
11, Walsall, 187, 16, 12
15, Tranmere Rovers, 164, 14, 12
21, Crawley Town, 248, 21, 12
8, Swindon Town, 208, 17, 12
3, Northampton Town, 189, 15, 13
7, Salford City, 195, 15, 13
17, Crewe Alexandra, 223, 17, 13
18, Newport County, 195, 14, 14
13, AFC Wimbledon, 178, 12, 15
1, Leyton Orient, 138, 9, 15
5, Bradford City, 159, 10, 16
2, Stevenage, 148, 9, 16
So, with the defensive numbers being so stark, why is this?
Is it a goalkeeper problem?
Are we just unlucky with opponents scoring worldies every game?
Is our defending generally really good but we make mistakes at crucial times which cost goals that the goalkeeper has no chance with?
gazza1988 wrote:
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Newhall1 and 399 guests