Dave Wayne wrote:Suttonian wrote:georgefostersbeard wrote:bigalstag1 wrote:He's a better manager than Clough will ever be.
Genuine question - statistically and record wise how does this bear out.
I thought that they had largely similar win percentages but happily wrong on this.
Clough has had quite a few cup runs and promotions so am I missing something?
When Evans became manager he was claiming something like 9 promotions in his managerial career, Clough has had 2. The football wasn't very good under Evans IMO but he had a knack of getting wins. He looked capable of another promotion with us until he walked out
Evans 42.7 win%
Clough 40.8 win%
So pretty similar
I always find it strange that nobody can ever list these 9 promotions he claims though.
Best I can find is :
Stamford - United Counties Premier 1997/98
Boston - Southern League 1999/2000
Boston - Conference 2001/02
Crawley - Conference 2010/11
Rotherham - League 2 2012/13
Rotherham - League 1 2013/14
So I make it 6 unless anyone can add any others ?
Stamford won the United Counties in 96/97 as well but were not allowed promotion as the ground was below standard so I guess he classes that as a 'promotion'.
Also, Crawley were promoted in 2011/12 after he walked out in April (familiar ) so I assume his ego is also claiming that one as his.
That takes it up to 8 at best, but on the other side of the coin, the 2 at Boston were both done with 'contract irregularities' so it could be as few as 4 'legal' promotions.
9 promotions is what he claimed when Stevo interviewed him, I'm not saying it's true. If the 2 with Boston weren't 'legal' they would surely have been relegated. Financial irregularities are nothing new in football. Look at Chesterfield during the Darren Brown years, raffles, using youth team budget to pay a players wages (couldn't resist the dig at them )