five to three wrote:I thought Harbottle had a great game and is really starting to look good. He seems to be overlooked.
wink68 wrote:Do we know how many of the 5709 weren't at the game.
wink68 wrote:Do we know how many of the 5709 weren't at the game.
Martin Shaw wrote:wink68 wrote:Do we know how many of the 5709 weren't at the game.
no. We're not going to get that information in future, just how many tickets (including season tickets) were sold
Bradders wrote:Martin Shaw wrote:wink68 wrote:Do we know how many of the 5709 weren't at the game.
no. We're not going to get that information in future, just how many tickets (including season tickets) were sold
It's very unsatisfactory. It's going to be difficult in the future to predict whether the game is going to be a big draw or not. Historical stats are going to be meaningless, for comparison purposes.
Yes, there are bigger problems around, but why volunteer to cause minor problems for no useful reason? The club knows how many people attended, so although there might be a "tickets sold" figure, why not recognise that there's some interest in comparing attendances?
Without stats and history, football is just another sport. Almost every football discussion, article and report brings in a historical context of some sort, usually involving stats. Break the continuity too much and you break the game.
Martin Shaw wrote:wink68 wrote:Do we know how many of the 5709 weren't at the game.
no. We're not going to get that information in future, just how many tickets (including season tickets) were sold
Martin Shaw wrote:on the attendances, I can't tell you why as I don't know. Only that I gather most clubs are doing it this way.
wink68 wrote:Martin Shaw wrote:on the attendances, I can't tell you why as I don't know. Only that I gather most clubs are doing it this way.
Can you ask someone Martin. I can't see why but if it has some sort of financial benefit then fair enough if it's to look good or just easier then tell us how many went through a turnstile. Presume the new all bells and whistles system actually counts them, but maybe not as it doesn't seem to want to let anybody in.
Captain Cunno wrote:wink68 wrote:Martin Shaw wrote:on the attendances, I can't tell you why as I don't know. Only that I gather most clubs are doing it this way.
Can you ask someone Martin. I can't see why but if it has some sort of financial benefit then fair enough if it's to look good or just easier then tell us how many went through a turnstile. Presume the new all bells and whistles system actually counts them, but maybe not as it doesn't seem to want to let anybody in.
So.we only had about 1000 non season ticket fans there ?
Curry 9 Brace 7 wrote:Just on about attendances, Chesterfield v Wrexham tuesday night was 8057, but in reality it may have not been that !??
Bradders wrote:Martin Shaw wrote:wink68 wrote:Do we know how many of the 5709 weren't at the game.
no. We're not going to get that information in future, just how many tickets (including season tickets) were sold
It's very unsatisfactory. It's going to be difficult in the future to predict whether the game is going to be a big draw or not. Historical stats are going to be meaningless, for comparison purposes.
Yes, there are bigger problems around, but why volunteer to cause minor problems for no useful reason? The club knows how many people attended, so although there might be a "tickets sold" figure, why not recognise that there's some interest in comparing attendances?
Without stats and history, football is just another sport. Almost every football discussion, article and report brings in a historical context of some sort, usually involving stats. Break the continuity too much and you break the game.
Rob wrote:Bradders wrote:Martin Shaw wrote:wink68 wrote:Do we know how many of the 5709 weren't at the game.
no. We're not going to get that information in future, just how many tickets (including season tickets) were sold
It's very unsatisfactory. It's going to be difficult in the future to predict whether the game is going to be a big draw or not. Historical stats are going to be meaningless, for comparison purposes.
Yes, there are bigger problems around, but why volunteer to cause minor problems for no useful reason? The club knows how many people attended, so although there might be a "tickets sold" figure, why not recognise that there's some interest in comparing attendances?
Without stats and history, football is just another sport. Almost every football discussion, article and report brings in a historical context of some sort, usually involving stats. Break the continuity too much and you break the game.
Completely agree, it's a nonsense! I'm on holiday so watched remotely but apparently I was there too!
Tippy Tappy Football wrote:George Maris was brilliant. 10 out of 10 and my MOM. Ollie Clarke and George Lapslie were also excellent (9.5) closely followed by Jordan Bowery (9)
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Dave Wayne, Paulstag and 85 guests