{ the forum }
 
An independent supporters' website dedicated to Mansfield Town FC

Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Discuss all things Stags and Football League Two, and share stuff using our BBCodes.
Forum rules
Please read the Posting Rules before participating. Posting on the forums is subject to adhering to these.
Also, see the Guidelines for Posting. Moderators may sometimes tidy posts which do not follow these customs.

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby bobbystagsfan » Sat Aug 06, 2022 4:53 pm

stag324 wrote:A solid if not impressive performance but 3 points is what mattered today.
Akins first touch isn’t great, which is my frustration with him and he should be at RWB.

Oates looks off the pace still and Hawkins had his usual 2 game blunders and picked up a needless booking.

Today showed we need another CF but we aren’t too far off a great team



Hawkins was a rock today, he played very well I think.
Although maybe you'd have preferred Hawkins to let their man go past him and score... sometimes you have to take one for the team.
bobbystagsfan
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 11109
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:47 pm

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby bluenyellow » Sat Aug 06, 2022 4:54 pm

1970Stag wrote:
gazza1988 wrote:5344 631


Thanks.
4500 season tickets, and disappointing from Tranmere to bring less than a 1000?

7,128 according the offical site and radio 103.2
Doc said i needed a pacemaker,so ive now got a flippin kenyan 2 yds in front of me everywhere i go.
User avatar
bluenyellow
Subs Bench
Subs Bench
 
Posts: 462
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 4:46 pm

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby bobbystagsfan » Sat Aug 06, 2022 4:57 pm

Seemed like there were more than 4,700 stags but not sure if there was 6,500. Confused :lol:
bobbystagsfan
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 11109
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:47 pm

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby West Ham 1969 » Sat Aug 06, 2022 4:57 pm

And that concludes another episode of the Seb Stockbridge show…how he is still a ref is beyond me :shock:
West Ham 1969
Subs Bench
Subs Bench
 
Posts: 411
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:29 pm

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby bobbystagsfan » Sat Aug 06, 2022 5:04 pm

West Ham 1969 wrote:And that concludes another episode of the Seb Stockbridge show…how he is still a ref is beyond me :shock:



I thought he was good first half, seemed to all go a bit mental in the 10 minutes after we scored
bobbystagsfan
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 11109
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:47 pm

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby gazza1988 » Sat Aug 06, 2022 5:06 pm

bluenyellow wrote:
1970Stag wrote:
gazza1988 wrote:5344 631


Thanks.
4500 season tickets, and disappointing from Tranmere to bring less than a 1000?

7,128 according the offical site and radio 103.2


Sorry I thought I deleted that. I was typing something else out and it put in in the reply box on here. I thought I'd got rid of it. That wasn't the attendance. That's my fault.
post meanings:
I know what I'm doing
Just guessing
You're an idiot and I'm poking you with a stick
User avatar
gazza1988
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 18464
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:23 pm
Location: Beeston, Nottingham

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby gazza1988 » Sat Aug 06, 2022 5:07 pm

post meanings:
I know what I'm doing
Just guessing
You're an idiot and I'm poking you with a stick
User avatar
gazza1988
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 18464
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:23 pm
Location: Beeston, Nottingham

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby Bros » Sat Aug 06, 2022 5:15 pm

So what was the attendance 5344. As announced at the ground or 7128 as they've put on the official Web site
Nunc est bibendum
Bros
Assistant Manager
Assistant Manager
 
Posts: 1258
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 10:33 am

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby Johnny H » Sat Aug 06, 2022 5:16 pm

gazza1988 wrote:5344 631


out of interest Gazza...Was that a guess ?
Where did those figures come from ??
Johnny H
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 1624
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby diablo » Sat Aug 06, 2022 5:20 pm

adamstag wrote:Akins got dogs abuse around us, i’d like to say well played sir, decent effort.

Can’t say i agree with you always starting, but today you were golden, well done.



Maybe they know more about football than you..Akins first touch and control is very poor...in fairness Tranmere's Centre half had him in his pocket most of the afternoon generally by trying to remove his shirt...his shooting is powder puff weak and he should have scored from the dolly side foot volley..Sorry but he is worse than Reid and that is saying something...not saying he doesn't try and make an effort but surely the Manager should have played Akins RWB with Bowery up front..Lapslie should start as should Clarke..tough game today onward and upward...Pym and Boateng outstanding today
diablo
First Team
First Team
 
Posts: 724
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:18 pm

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby Reg Holdsworth » Sat Aug 06, 2022 5:20 pm

Surprised it was over 7000 … there were 1,100 empty seats in the North Stand and the IGU where sit wasn’t anywhere near full. Liverpool FA cup game - when the entire stadium was full - only achieved 7.5K
Last edited by Reg Holdsworth on Sat Aug 06, 2022 5:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reg Holdsworth
Reserve Team
Reserve Team
 
Posts: 195
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2014 3:50 pm
Location: Mansfield

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby HitchcocksShins » Sat Aug 06, 2022 5:22 pm

I'm looking forward to seeing the Cantona kick their man didn't get punished for. Absolutely atrocious reffing.
twitter.com/SatiricalStag

"Couldn't you just stick to crayoning in poorly drawn pics?"
User avatar
HitchcocksShins
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 3562
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:17 am

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby part time pete » Sat Aug 06, 2022 5:25 pm

Johnny H wrote:
gazza1988 wrote:5344 631


out of interest Gazza...Was that a guess ?
Where did those figures come from ??


That was the announced figure over the tannoy on about 75 minutes.

I thought that figure was low, but it might have been the crowd numbers in ground at 3pm. :lol:

Twitter official says 7128 with 621 away fans

I am just wondering if this figure was number of tickets sold because of the trouble with the scanners.
Those accustomed to privilege may feel that equality is oppression.
part time pete
Prediction League Manager
 
Posts: 10319
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 4:39 pm

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby Johnny H » Sat Aug 06, 2022 5:30 pm

part time pete wrote:
Johnny H wrote:
gazza1988 wrote:5344 631


out of interest Gazza...Was that a guess ?
Where did those figures come from ??


That was the announced figure over the tannoy on about 75 minutes.

I thought that figure was low, but it might have been the crowd numbers in ground at 3pm. :lol:

Twitter official says 7128 with 621 away fans

I am just wondering if this figure was number of tickets sold because of the trouble with the scanners.


thanks
Johnny H
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 1624
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby STAGS FOR LIFE » Sat Aug 06, 2022 5:36 pm

:)

User avatar
STAGS FOR LIFE
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 9340
Joined: Wed May 21, 2014 8:32 am

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby adamstag » Sat Aug 06, 2022 5:50 pm

diablo wrote:
adamstag wrote:Akins got dogs abuse around us, i’d like to say well played sir, decent effort.

Can’t say i agree with you always starting, but today you were golden, well done.



Maybe they know more about football than you..Akins first touch and control is very poor...in fairness Tranmere's Centre half had him in his pocket most of the afternoon generally by trying to remove his shirt...his shooting is powder puff weak and he should have scored from the dolly side foot volley..Sorry but he is worse than Reid and that is saying something...not saying he doesn't try and make an effort but surely the Manager should have played Akins RWB with Bowery up front..Lapslie should start as should Clarke..tough game today onward and upward...Pym and Boateng outstanding today


they probably don’t.
adamstag
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 11171
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 9:20 am

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby Cleveland_Stag » Sat Aug 06, 2022 5:50 pm

MTFCMusings wrote:
stag324 wrote:A solid if not impressive performance but 3 points is what mattered today.
Akins first touch isn’t great, which is my frustration with him and he should be at RWB.

Oates looks off the pace still and Hawkins had his usual 2 game blunders and picked up a needless booking.

Today showed we need another CF but we aren’t too far off a great team


It wasn’t a needless booking, they were on the counter with two of our defenders out of the game. He had no choice.


Yep. Was a good foul from Hawkins and was worth the booking.

Boateng, Hawkins and Pym were terrific today. Can’t get over how good Boateng is. He bossed it in there today.
Cleveland_Stag
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 1883
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2019 1:12 pm

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby Martin Shaw » Sat Aug 06, 2022 5:51 pm

"Four points clear as Lincoln are McCaffreyised", CHAD headline, April 1975
Martin Shaw
Site Admin
 
Posts: 29156
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:20 pm
Location: West London

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby ST4GS » Sat Aug 06, 2022 6:00 pm

No chance 7 thousand plus. That is an obvious error.
First match : 04.01.1975 home v Cambridge Utd F.A.Cup 3rd Round 1-0 Clarke
User avatar
ST4GS
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 1577
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:42 pm

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby Sneag » Sat Aug 06, 2022 6:13 pm

ST4GS wrote:No chance 7 thousand plus. That is an obvious error.


I thought 5,300 seemed light, but it didn't seem like 7,100 either. :lol:
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
User avatar
Sneag
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 14159
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 6:41 pm
Location: King Solomon he never lived `round here

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby Arnolds Rod » Sat Aug 06, 2022 6:15 pm

diablo wrote:
adamstag wrote:Akins got dogs abuse around us, i’d like to say well played sir, decent effort.

Can’t say i agree with you always starting, but today you were golden, well done.



Maybe they know more about football than you..Akins first touch and control is very poor...in fairness Tranmere's Centre half had him in his pocket most of the afternoon generally by trying to remove his shirt...his shooting is powder puff weak and he should have scored from the dolly side foot volley..Sorry but he is worse than Reid and that is saying something...not saying he doesn't try and make an effort but surely the Manager should have played Akins RWB with Bowery up front..Lapslie should start as should Clarke..tough game today onward and upward...Pym and Boateng outstanding today


Totally agree Diablo. Akins is a bench warmer at best. Lapslie must be wondering how the hell Akins starts up front rather than him.
Arnolds Rod
Reserve Team
Reserve Team
 
Posts: 167
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2020 5:32 pm

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby Ralphy » Sat Aug 06, 2022 6:19 pm

Thought Akins did well today, constantly fouled all game but always available to get us up the pitch.
Ralphy
Subs Bench
Subs Bench
 
Posts: 637
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2022 12:18 pm

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby stag324 » Sat Aug 06, 2022 6:28 pm

MTFCMusings wrote:
stag324 wrote:A solid if not impressive performance but 3 points is what mattered today.
Akins first touch isn’t great, which is my frustration with him and he should be at RWB.

Oates looks off the pace still and Hawkins had his usual 2 game blunders and picked up a needless booking.

Today showed we need another CF but we aren’t too far off a great team


It wasn’t a needless booking, they were on the counter with two of our defenders out of the game. He had no choice.


I disagree. It was born out of frustration for us not getting a free kick seconds before
stag324
Assistant Manager
Assistant Manager
 
Posts: 1189
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 11:37 am

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby Ralphy » Sat Aug 06, 2022 6:33 pm

He definitely took one for the team there, they were away and in on goal if he didn’t!!
Ralphy
Subs Bench
Subs Bench
 
Posts: 637
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2022 12:18 pm

Re: Tranny score fred sponsored by Oates 2 or more

Postby Rob » Sat Aug 06, 2022 6:36 pm

Showaddywaddy wrote:My first time seeing the new players and was impressed with all of them, including Swan when he came on.

In Maris, Quinn and Boateng I would go as far as to say we have the best midfield in the division, I thought they were magnificent.

Hawkins was superb in defence and got himself in the right place at the right time on several occasions.

Bowery had a very good game a RWB with the exception of the horror back pass.

I thought Harbottle had a good game and mostly looked very assured.

Oates wasn’t quite at it and I don’t think Akins was any better or worse than I’ve seen him previously, a few heavy touches and loss of possession mixed with some decent hold up play and a very fine effort on goal at the end of the game. personally prefer Bowery up front and I think Oates plays better with Jordan alongside him.

Overall a thoroughly deserved three points and a note on Tranmere who in the closing stages looked like they were all completely shattered.


Agree with most of that, I would say Hawkins was decent rather than superb but as you say the midfield trio of Maris, Quinn and Boateng were excellent. I'd definitely prefer Bowery up front, as AWC said, with either Akins or Hewitt at RWB. Oates and Macca were not at their best.

I agree with others that there is absolutely no way was the attendance 7,100 :lol: I even got a cup i
of tea today!
Rob
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 10774
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:33 am

PreviousNext

Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: adamr999, awalkinthepark, Bing [Bot], bobbystagsfan, kieranbenton, LMStag, oldweststander, Roger_Sausage, Sneag, STAGS FOR LIFE, Stoney and 434 guests