The One wrote:Playing in friendly at Barnsley, incontention for Saturday
Billy the fish wrote:The One wrote:Playing in friendly at Barnsley, incontention for Saturday
Anyone know the score or indeed did DJ score ???
Amber Andy wrote:If that's the case, it makes you wonder why we signed him in the first place.Johnny H wrote:diablo wrote:Costastag wrote:Sneag wrote:Nige has always said he didn't have a problem with DJ, just that he (DJ) wanted more game time & he didn't fit in with the system we were playng at the time.
You mean winning games and scoring dont you
Maybe the system was wrong....
All the systems we play will not suit DJ
None of the 451, 4141, 541, 4321 or 5311 systems will
But a 442 Diamond would......
I think it is best all round if he doesn't play Saturday. However, if we don't score this board will be red hot.Costastag wrote:I really dont think he will play on saturday like clough says talks between the player his representatives and the owners ,bet hes gone before the end of the month
part time pete wrote:Danny Johnson has the same agent as Jimmy Knowles, Callum Johnson and Keller-Dunn at Burton.
STAGS FOR LIFE wrote:part time pete wrote:Danny Johnson has the same agent as Jimmy Knowles, Callum Johnson and Keller-Dunn at Burton.
Pete it's Tuesday , Fred day tomorrow
Captain Cunno wrote:We won 4 -1 , Swan got 3 and Maris the other so I would say no Geoff...
oldweststander wrote:Depends on Danny's line of thought.
1) He clearly doesn't want to move away from the area.
2) He says he doesn't want to commit to anywhere for more than six months, so a half reasonable fee is unlikely unless he changes on that score.
3) Would imagine MTFC have a years option on him should they want to invoke it.
4) If both Nigel and Danny sincerely commit to each other until May then we keep him and see where we are in May.
At the end of the day, whatever happens, it is all down to Danny Johnson to make his mind up in an open and honest way.
Gruff wrote:If Johnson was not already a Stags player, this board would be screaming for us to sign him... and be delighted if we got him.
Stoney wrote:I'm probably in a minority but I think the best chance of us scoring plenty would be a front 2 of Johnson and Swan.
Seems a bit harsh but I think Oates has been off it since his return and would be better used as an impact sub for a while.
I am a big Oates fan but agree with your view. He has been struggling as of late.Stoney wrote:I'm probably in a minority but I think the best chance of us scoring plenty would be a front 2 of Johnson and Swan.
Seems a bit harsh but I think Oates has been off it since his return and would be better used as an impact sub for a while.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Cleveland_Stag, grufti, hucknall stag, patstag, percystag, Roger_Sausage, Scothie the Stag, ST4GS, Stags Head Stags, Stoney, West Bridgford Stag and 486 guests