{ the forum }
 
An independent supporters' website dedicated to Mansfield Town FC

Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Discuss all things Stags and Football League Two, and share stuff using our BBCodes.
Forum rules
Please read the Posting Rules before participating. Posting on the forums is subject to adhering to these.
Also, see the Guidelines for Posting. Moderators may sometimes tidy posts which do not follow these customs.

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby part time pete » Thu May 12, 2022 6:48 pm

League rules state that of the 16 outfield players on last week’s team sheet, then 10 have to appear on this week’s team sheet.
Those accustomed to privilege may feel that equality is oppression.
part time pete
Prediction League Manager
 
Posts: 10319
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 4:39 pm

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby Martin Shaw » Thu May 12, 2022 7:28 pm

Tawnystag wrote:
Martin Shaw wrote:A 17 year old, who looked about 12, in goal, whose attempts to save the goals was feeble. When they had a decent experienced keeper on the bench. One of the other 17 year olds who played was released on Monday. So what was the point of that other than putting out as weak a side as possible?


It was the same keeper they used the week before when they drew 1-1 with Hartlepool. This was hardly a weakened team used exclusively just for the last game of the season. Northampton only have themselves to blame for not pushing on to improve their score when they heard the goals were raining in at The Memorial Ground.

I don't agree. The Hartlepool game was of no meaning to both sides. The Bristol Rovers game was. They should have maintained the integrity of the league by playing a reasonable side against Bristol Rovers. They didn't.
"Four points clear as Lincoln are McCaffreyised", CHAD headline, April 1975
Martin Shaw
Site Admin
 
Posts: 29154
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:20 pm
Location: West London

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby MTFCMusings » Thu May 12, 2022 7:37 pm

I don’t think we’re in a position to talk about the integrity of the league after the last ten minutes on Saturday.

I don’t think Scunthorpe did anything wrong, and the rules say they didn’t either. Their only priority should be to do what’s best for them for the future.
MTFCMusings
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 13695
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 10:16 pm

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby STAGS FOR LIFE » Thu May 12, 2022 7:47 pm

:D David Sharpe & The play-offs - Shout Shout (Knock Northampton Out)

Shout shout, knock Northampton out,
Come on yellows yellows , loud and swell
Come on scream scream, you know what I mean,
Put another coin in the Stags machine.

Last edited by STAGS FOR LIFE on Thu May 12, 2022 8:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
STAGS FOR LIFE
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 9337
Joined: Wed May 21, 2014 8:32 am

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby Stag95 » Thu May 12, 2022 7:49 pm

If I could have picked any team to play it would have been them. If we play like we did last time against them where their keeper had the game of his life we’ll have the tie won Saturday night.
Stag95
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 1573
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:41 am

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby Tawnystag » Thu May 12, 2022 9:39 pm

Martin Shaw wrote:
Tawnystag wrote:
Martin Shaw wrote:A 17 year old, who looked about 12, in goal, whose attempts to save the goals was feeble. When they had a decent experienced keeper on the bench. One of the other 17 year olds who played was released on Monday. So what was the point of that other than putting out as weak a side as possible?


It was the same keeper they used the week before when they drew 1-1 with Hartlepool. This was hardly a weakened team used exclusively just for the last game of the season. Northampton only have themselves to blame for not pushing on to improve their score when they heard the goals were raining in at The Memorial Ground.

I don't agree. The Hartlepool game was of no meaning to both sides. The Bristol Rovers game was. They should have maintained the integrity of the league by playing a reasonable side against Bristol Rovers. They didn't.



You could argue that a draw with Hartlepool was a good result and enough justification to play the majority of the same team again to try and get a result against Bristol. Meanwhile Mansfield and FGR teams agree to knock the ball around the back line for 10 minutes in order to preserve their respective finishing positions in the league. Much more questionable in my view.
Tawnystag
Reserve Team
Reserve Team
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2017 7:00 pm

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby Martin Shaw » Thu May 12, 2022 9:48 pm

Tawnystag wrote:Mansfield and FGR teams agree to knock the ball around the back line for 10 minutes in order to preserve their respective finishing positions in the league. Much more questionable in my view.

ok we'll disagree.

It was less than 3 minutes, not 10 minutes though.
"Four points clear as Lincoln are McCaffreyised", CHAD headline, April 1975
Martin Shaw
Site Admin
 
Posts: 29154
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:20 pm
Location: West London

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby Sedgwick » Fri May 13, 2022 7:59 am

MTFCMusings wrote:I don’t think we’re in a position to talk about the integrity of the league after the last ten minutes on Saturday.

I don’t think Scunthorpe did anything wrong, and the rules say they didn’t either. Their only priority should be to do what’s best for them for the future.


Watch it back, it was barely 5 minutes not 10.... anything to try and make a point :roll:
Sedgwick
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 6699
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2017 1:01 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby MTFCMusings » Fri May 13, 2022 8:42 am

Sedgwick wrote:
MTFCMusings wrote:I don’t think we’re in a position to talk about the integrity of the league after the last ten minutes on Saturday.

I don’t think Scunthorpe did anything wrong, and the rules say they didn’t either. Their only priority should be to do what’s best for them for the future.


Watch it back, it was barely 5 minutes not 10.... anything to try and make a point :roll:


I had watched it back. The intent goes out of the game from the 86th minute. Both teams just exchanging throw-ins, lumping the ball with one touch as far away from each goal as possible. The keeping the ball at the back was just in stoppage time, but the drop in intent was well before that :roll:
MTFCMusings
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 13695
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 10:16 pm

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby Tawnystag » Fri May 13, 2022 8:51 am

MTFCMusings wrote:
Sedgwick wrote:
MTFCMusings wrote:I don’t think we’re in a position to talk about the integrity of the league after the last ten minutes on Saturday.

I don’t think Scunthorpe did anything wrong, and the rules say they didn’t either. Their only priority should be to do what’s best for them for the future.


Watch it back, it was barely 5 minutes not 10.... anything to try and make a point :roll:


I had watched it back. The intent goes out of the game from the 86th minute. Both teams just exchanging throw-ins, lumping the ball with one touch as far away from each goal as possible. The keeping the ball at the back was just in stoppage time, but the drop in intent was well before that :roll:


Correct. We sit 3 rows behind the dug-out and there was an exchange between the teams around then, followed by a visible standing off.
Tawnystag
Reserve Team
Reserve Team
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2017 7:00 pm

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby Sedgwick » Fri May 13, 2022 8:57 am

MTFCMusings wrote:
Sedgwick wrote:
MTFCMusings wrote:I don’t think we’re in a position to talk about the integrity of the league after the last ten minutes on Saturday.

I don’t think Scunthorpe did anything wrong, and the rules say they didn’t either. Their only priority should be to do what’s best for them for the future.


Watch it back, it was barely 5 minutes not 10.... anything to try and make a point :roll:


I had watched it back. The intent goes out of the game from the 86th minute. Both teams just exchanging throw-ins, lumping the ball with one touch as far away from each goal as possible. The keeping the ball at the back was just in stoppage time, but the drop in intent was well before that :roll:


But it was only just over 3 minutes they actually stood off and didn't play, which is where the "issue" is, nothing wrong with anything before that at all.

The "drop in intent" is just your opinion.. they were still playing the game fairly.
Sedgwick
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 6699
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2017 1:01 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby stag861 » Fri May 13, 2022 8:59 am

It would have been interesting if Exeter had scored during this truce
Per crassum et tenues
stag861
Assistant Manager
Assistant Manager
 
Posts: 1209
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 am

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby MTFCMusings » Fri May 13, 2022 9:00 am

You’re welcome to your opinion but the lumping the ball out for a throw in with every touch and keeping the ball under no pressure at the back are just different ways to achieve the same goal.
MTFCMusings
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 13695
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 10:16 pm

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby Sedgwick » Fri May 13, 2022 9:08 am

Every touch was it, straight out? They were still still playing. Hence why you could only really have an issue with the last three minutes and suggesting it was over 10 is wrong.

Think both clubs did the right thing and was quite sporting to each other, do what's best for you within the laws of the game.
Sedgwick
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 6699
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2017 1:01 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby MTFCMusings » Fri May 13, 2022 9:21 am

Sedgwick wrote:Every touch was it, straight out? They were still still playing. Hence why you could only really have an issue with the last three minutes and suggesting it was over 10 is wrong.

Think both clubs did the right thing and was quite sporting to each other, do what's best for you within the laws of the game.


Yes it was, from the 86th minute. Aimless balls and lots of throw-ins. Watch it back.

I don’t really have an issue with it, but I might do it I was a Sutton fan. Just thought it was worth pointing out when some were questioning the integrity of other sides.
MTFCMusings
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 13695
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 10:16 pm

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby Rob » Fri May 13, 2022 12:45 pm

Rhys Day just been on H&J talking about the 04 play-offs with Northampton.
Rob
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 10773
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:33 am

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby adamstag » Fri May 13, 2022 12:48 pm

MTFCMusings wrote:
Sedgwick wrote:Every touch was it, straight out? They were still still playing. Hence why you could only really have an issue with the last three minutes and suggesting it was over 10 is wrong.

Think both clubs did the right thing and was quite sporting to each other, do what's best for you within the laws of the game.


Yes it was, from the 86th minute. Aimless balls and lots of throw-ins. Watch it back.

I don’t really have an issue with it, but I might do it I was a Sutton fan. Just thought it was worth pointing out when some were questioning the integrity of other sides.


It was obvious both sides/clubs/managers whoever had a word with about 5 mins to go and basically it was a kick about, neither side did anything we just gently passed it about.

the point about sutton though, i suppose is just bad luck, we both earned the right to do what we did, and it would be impossible to prove even if it were investigated (which it won’t be)
adamstag
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 11171
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 9:20 am

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby Gasbug+ » Fri May 13, 2022 10:13 pm

Good luck in the play-offs stags.You we’re by far the best of the other 3 contenders against us and I hope you will triumph and join us in league 1 next season.Please put Northampton out of their misery,they are just a team of anti football spoilers,yes they are good at it but Christ I’m so glad I don’t have to watch that raspberry every week.Swindon in the final for you I think and then kick their arses as well.All the very best of luck to you.
Gasbug+
Youth Team
Youth Team
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri May 13, 2022 2:33 pm

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby Marky Mark » Fri May 13, 2022 10:35 pm

MTFCMusings wrote:
Sedgwick wrote:Every touch was it, straight out? They were still still playing. Hence why you could only really have an issue with the last three minutes and suggesting it was over 10 is wrong.

Think both clubs did the right thing and was quite sporting to each other, do what's best for you within the laws of the game.


Yes it was, from the 86th minute. Aimless balls and lots of throw-ins. Watch it back.

I don’t really have an issue with it, but I might do it I was a Sutton fan. Just thought it was worth pointing out when some were questioning the integrity of other sides.


It happened a couple of minutes before the board went up. I was right behind the dug out so saw it from the very first moment that Clough approached Edwards, to Edwards then calling his captain over to tell him. I did think that there might not actually be an injury time. The problem seemed to be that no-one told the Stags players to calm down so the back 4 were all shaping to go forwards until they clicked what was happening, which was after the board went up - so the conversation happened around 88/89 minutes, then the board went up for 4 minutes then the back 4 clicked what was happening. At no point before this did it feel like the team took it upon themselves to slow it down or put the ball out of play, if anything it was the opposite as I was very very surprised at our naivety and lack of game nous in the last 10 minutes. Free kicks were being taken quickly, Bishop was restarting play quicker than he needed to, Clough came haring out of the dug out a few times to rollock someone for humping the ball forward when we could have kept it (I think one time was Maris), Bishop actually got a rollocking for the opposite by playing out from the back quickly and not keeping the ball for a while then belting the ball forward - Clough went straight to him after the whistle to tell him - only Quinn bought a foul in that time to slow the game down.
"Football is a game of opinions, and very little knowledge"
User avatar
Marky Mark
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 6024
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 6:48 pm
Location: New Brighton

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby yorkshire stag » Sat May 14, 2022 6:26 am

2-1 Stags tight game with a 1-1 at their place, the flippin stress this lot put you through it’s bonkers
Our time will come
User avatar
yorkshire stag
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 14731
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 7:35 pm

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby MOTG » Sat May 14, 2022 6:33 am

Good morning to all you Stags fans. Well a little over 12 hrs and our 1st leg will begin. What are your build up plans prior to the match ? Are you nervous? It’s exciting I know for sure! I have a sneaky feeling Akins will score today and be a hero…. COYS
MOTG
Subs Bench
Subs Bench
 
Posts: 637
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 9:52 am

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby Tawnystag » Sat May 14, 2022 6:37 am

Marky Mark wrote:
MTFCMusings wrote:
Sedgwick wrote:Every touch was it, straight out? They were still still playing. Hence why you could only really have an issue with the last three minutes and suggesting it was over 10 is wrong.

Think both clubs did the right thing and was quite sporting to each other, do what's best for you within the laws of the game.


Yes it was, from the 86th minute. Aimless balls and lots of throw-ins. Watch it back.

I don’t really have an issue with it, but I might do it I was a Sutton fan. Just thought it was worth pointing out when some were questioning the integrity of other sides.


It happened a couple of minutes before the board went up. I was right behind the dug out so saw it from the very first moment that Clough approached Edwards, to Edwards then calling his captain over to tell him. I did think that there might not actually be an injury time. The problem seemed to be that no-one told the Stags players to calm down so the back 4 were all shaping to go forwards until they clicked what was happening, which was after the board went up - so the conversation happened around 88/89 minutes, then the board went up for 4 minutes then the back 4 clicked what was happening. At no point before this did it feel like the team took it upon themselves to slow it down or put the ball out of play, if anything it was the opposite as I was very very surprised at our naivety and lack of game nous in the last 10 minutes. Free kicks were being taken quickly, Bishop was restarting play quicker than he needed to, Clough came haring out of the dug out a few times to rollock someone for humping the ball forward when we could have kept it (I think one time was Maris), Bishop actually got a rollocking for the opposite by playing out from the back quickly and not keeping the ball for a while then belting the ball forward - Clough went straight to him after the whistle to tell him - only Quinn bought a foul in that time to slow the game down.


This is precisely what happened. My original point is that we can hardly cast aspersions towards Scunthorpe (who on the day, simply played the same team who managed to get a result the week before at Hartlepool), whilst at the same time, ours and FGR management are overseeing an arrangement where they have agreed not to score against each other in the latter parts of the game.

Northampton had ample time to push on and secure their spot, but by all accounts decided to sit back after they had scored 3.
Tawnystag
Reserve Team
Reserve Team
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2017 7:00 pm

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby yorkshire stag » Sat May 14, 2022 7:13 am

MOTG wrote:Good morning to all you Stags fans. Well a little over 12 hrs and our 1st leg will begin. What are your build up plans prior to the match ? Are you nervous? It’s exciting I know for sure! I have a sneaky feeling Akins will score today and be a hero…. COYS


my strategy is to cut lawns, a bike ride, steady drive down this afternoon then early into spoons to discuss tactics with Spiro, old Stag & young Yorkie, i absolutely hate the play off’s, way to much stress
Our time will come
User avatar
yorkshire stag
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 14731
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 7:35 pm

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby diablo » Sat May 14, 2022 8:16 am

MOTG wrote:Good morning to all you Stags fans. Well a little over 12 hrs and our 1st leg will begin. What are your build up plans prior to the match ? Are you nervous? It’s exciting I know for sure! I have a sneaky feeling Akins will score today and be a hero…. COYS



lol...you wish
diablo
First Team
First Team
 
Posts: 724
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:18 pm

Re: Cobblers scorefred sponsored by 'Three steps to Heaven'.

Postby MTFCMusings » Sat May 14, 2022 8:48 am

I think the biggest cheer tonight could be Oli Hawkins picking up a yellow card given the price huge price the bookies have him at :lol:
MTFCMusings
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 13695
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 10:16 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 4dstag, dublin_stag, Hon Sec, kieranbenton, La Manga Stag, oldweststander, Sandy Pate Best Stag and 417 guests