Tawnystag wrote:Martin Shaw wrote:A 17 year old, who looked about 12, in goal, whose attempts to save the goals was feeble. When they had a decent experienced keeper on the bench. One of the other 17 year olds who played was released on Monday. So what was the point of that other than putting out as weak a side as possible?
It was the same keeper they used the week before when they drew 1-1 with Hartlepool. This was hardly a weakened team used exclusively just for the last game of the season. Northampton only have themselves to blame for not pushing on to improve their score when they heard the goals were raining in at The Memorial Ground.
Martin Shaw wrote:Tawnystag wrote:Martin Shaw wrote:A 17 year old, who looked about 12, in goal, whose attempts to save the goals was feeble. When they had a decent experienced keeper on the bench. One of the other 17 year olds who played was released on Monday. So what was the point of that other than putting out as weak a side as possible?
It was the same keeper they used the week before when they drew 1-1 with Hartlepool. This was hardly a weakened team used exclusively just for the last game of the season. Northampton only have themselves to blame for not pushing on to improve their score when they heard the goals were raining in at The Memorial Ground.
I don't agree. The Hartlepool game was of no meaning to both sides. The Bristol Rovers game was. They should have maintained the integrity of the league by playing a reasonable side against Bristol Rovers. They didn't.
Tawnystag wrote:Mansfield and FGR teams agree to knock the ball around the back line for 10 minutes in order to preserve their respective finishing positions in the league. Much more questionable in my view.
MTFCMusings wrote:I don’t think we’re in a position to talk about the integrity of the league after the last ten minutes on Saturday.
I don’t think Scunthorpe did anything wrong, and the rules say they didn’t either. Their only priority should be to do what’s best for them for the future.
Sedgwick wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:I don’t think we’re in a position to talk about the integrity of the league after the last ten minutes on Saturday.
I don’t think Scunthorpe did anything wrong, and the rules say they didn’t either. Their only priority should be to do what’s best for them for the future.
Watch it back, it was barely 5 minutes not 10.... anything to try and make a point
MTFCMusings wrote:Sedgwick wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:I don’t think we’re in a position to talk about the integrity of the league after the last ten minutes on Saturday.
I don’t think Scunthorpe did anything wrong, and the rules say they didn’t either. Their only priority should be to do what’s best for them for the future.
Watch it back, it was barely 5 minutes not 10.... anything to try and make a point
I had watched it back. The intent goes out of the game from the 86th minute. Both teams just exchanging throw-ins, lumping the ball with one touch as far away from each goal as possible. The keeping the ball at the back was just in stoppage time, but the drop in intent was well before that
MTFCMusings wrote:Sedgwick wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:I don’t think we’re in a position to talk about the integrity of the league after the last ten minutes on Saturday.
I don’t think Scunthorpe did anything wrong, and the rules say they didn’t either. Their only priority should be to do what’s best for them for the future.
Watch it back, it was barely 5 minutes not 10.... anything to try and make a point
I had watched it back. The intent goes out of the game from the 86th minute. Both teams just exchanging throw-ins, lumping the ball with one touch as far away from each goal as possible. The keeping the ball at the back was just in stoppage time, but the drop in intent was well before that
Sedgwick wrote:Every touch was it, straight out? They were still still playing. Hence why you could only really have an issue with the last three minutes and suggesting it was over 10 is wrong.
Think both clubs did the right thing and was quite sporting to each other, do what's best for you within the laws of the game.
MTFCMusings wrote:Sedgwick wrote:Every touch was it, straight out? They were still still playing. Hence why you could only really have an issue with the last three minutes and suggesting it was over 10 is wrong.
Think both clubs did the right thing and was quite sporting to each other, do what's best for you within the laws of the game.
Yes it was, from the 86th minute. Aimless balls and lots of throw-ins. Watch it back.
I don’t really have an issue with it, but I might do it I was a Sutton fan. Just thought it was worth pointing out when some were questioning the integrity of other sides.
MTFCMusings wrote:Sedgwick wrote:Every touch was it, straight out? They were still still playing. Hence why you could only really have an issue with the last three minutes and suggesting it was over 10 is wrong.
Think both clubs did the right thing and was quite sporting to each other, do what's best for you within the laws of the game.
Yes it was, from the 86th minute. Aimless balls and lots of throw-ins. Watch it back.
I don’t really have an issue with it, but I might do it I was a Sutton fan. Just thought it was worth pointing out when some were questioning the integrity of other sides.
Marky Mark wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Sedgwick wrote:Every touch was it, straight out? They were still still playing. Hence why you could only really have an issue with the last three minutes and suggesting it was over 10 is wrong.
Think both clubs did the right thing and was quite sporting to each other, do what's best for you within the laws of the game.
Yes it was, from the 86th minute. Aimless balls and lots of throw-ins. Watch it back.
I don’t really have an issue with it, but I might do it I was a Sutton fan. Just thought it was worth pointing out when some were questioning the integrity of other sides.
It happened a couple of minutes before the board went up. I was right behind the dug out so saw it from the very first moment that Clough approached Edwards, to Edwards then calling his captain over to tell him. I did think that there might not actually be an injury time. The problem seemed to be that no-one told the Stags players to calm down so the back 4 were all shaping to go forwards until they clicked what was happening, which was after the board went up - so the conversation happened around 88/89 minutes, then the board went up for 4 minutes then the back 4 clicked what was happening. At no point before this did it feel like the team took it upon themselves to slow it down or put the ball out of play, if anything it was the opposite as I was very very surprised at our naivety and lack of game nous in the last 10 minutes. Free kicks were being taken quickly, Bishop was restarting play quicker than he needed to, Clough came haring out of the dug out a few times to rollock someone for humping the ball forward when we could have kept it (I think one time was Maris), Bishop actually got a rollocking for the opposite by playing out from the back quickly and not keeping the ball for a while then belting the ball forward - Clough went straight to him after the whistle to tell him - only Quinn bought a foul in that time to slow the game down.
MOTG wrote:Good morning to all you Stags fans. Well a little over 12 hrs and our 1st leg will begin. What are your build up plans prior to the match ? Are you nervous? It’s exciting I know for sure! I have a sneaky feeling Akins will score today and be a hero…. COYS
MOTG wrote:Good morning to all you Stags fans. Well a little over 12 hrs and our 1st leg will begin. What are your build up plans prior to the match ? Are you nervous? It’s exciting I know for sure! I have a sneaky feeling Akins will score today and be a hero…. COYS
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: 4dstag, dublin_stag, Hon Sec, kieranbenton, La Manga Stag, oldweststander, Sandy Pate Best Stag and 417 guests