bellwhiff wrote:Sedgwick wrote:bellwhiff wrote:The fact that he thinks our best centre forward is our best centre half lays bare the utterly embarrassing transfer policy at this club. I don’t suppose he got asked any hard questions by the pet journalists?
You keep banging on about the transfer policy... what exactly do you think it is? Do you think they missed out on three key targets on purpose...
Yeah and I’ll keep banging on about it because it’s not fit for purpose. One transfer window gooseberry up is bad but one over the summer is a scandal. They missed out on Naylor ages ago. Do YOU think it’s fit for purpose when we have to bring in two inexperienced players, one of whom is crocked, 2 hours before the window closed ?
You think that’s a sign of a good system ?
yeah but you're acting like we missed out on Naylor and did nothing for weeks... you know the narrative, we had other targets we went for and missed out.
You are genuinely acting like its not possible that mighty Masnfield town can miss out on players, like we have a given right to just be able to go and sign some super star, and if they don't come, find and sign another a the drop of a hat. And because we didn't do just that the "policy" isn't any good.
You're still also to say what you think our "transfer policy" is... if its that bad, talk us through what exactly it is.
The goal with transfers seems to be clearly identifying a shortlist of targets, that A. Dont cost a big fee and B. Dont cost the earth in wages. Theres nothing wrong with the transfer policy, yes it wasn't a good window for defenders but its the execution of landing these targets that was the problem, not the policy its self.
Unless you expect us to have 5 top tier players and start negotiations with them all just incase... It doesn't work like that.