bear 73 wrote:gazza1988 wrote:I don't think you've understood my second question.
Does he sign players to play in a secondary position? He tried to sign Naylor, initially a centre half but by all accounts flourished as a central midfielder, to play centre back. His not "secondary" position. Signed Hewitt, a player once transferred for a 6 figure sum as a right back, played him centre back because that's where he played for 2 relegated clubs. Charsley (he didn't sign him, but gave him a new deal) a central midfielder played on the right of a front 3 of Bowery Reid and Charsley. Gordon (do I need to repeat this?
). Macca, a winger/midfielder in the championship but played at left back here. Does Clough have a history of doing this?
A further question on the answer to the first question. If George isn't ready then why didn't we sign more defenders. If we are talking main positions, we've got 3 central defenders. 1 hasn't been fit for us yet, another came on deadline say, into a season. The other is Rawson. To cover centre half we have to weaken the rest of the side. We'd have to weaken right back for perch to play centre half. Heck we're at a point where we now may have to weaken our forward line (arguably the only thing keeping us afloat) to plug the gap at the back. The very gap Clough has spent around 9 month complaining about.
If Clough came out and said he'd taken a gamble on our back line and it's failed horribly and owns that error there would be alot less questioning his management. Some will moan about it after another game where we pay the price of it but not alot we can do. I just find it odd he can criticise players for "not tackling their mate" but takes ko ownership of his own big mistakes.
I cannot answer a question that is so simple Naylor and Hewitt have played centre back, where a player plays is up to the manager, we has fans form our own opinions formed on very little knowledge, and i defy 4 fans picking the same team with our squad, wingers at full back started at Leeds Utd with Cooper, and full backs have been more on the front foot for many years.
many central defenders have originally been full backs, or defensive midfielders, Please explain why you know more thanthe manager.
and explain which manager over the last 17 years you have supported to take this club forward, and why it has not worked with players in their right positions.
Clough square pegs in round holes worked at Derby, Sheff UTd, Burton, and his Dads Worked at Derby and Forest
,
So, yes. Square pegs in round holes may work higher up with a higher standard of player. Down here it just doesn't.unless the players are a higher standard. Macca, Perch and Quinn are technically higher standard players and cope well with being in a secondary position. That's fine. But when you take a league 2 standard player and move them they perform like a non-league player.
I could point out Clough has 1 promotion in the professional leagues and a couple of good cup runs. I could point out hes never achieved promotion out of the this league. In fact has he ever managed in league 2? So maybe we need to cut him some slack because he doesn't know the league or what it takes to get out of it just yet.
All I'm saying is square pegs in round holes rarely work for us and results are supporting that.
I don't know more than the manager
"and explain which manager over the last 17 years you have supported to take this club forward, and why it has not worked with players in their right positions"
Amazing, my question about whether Clough signs players to play them out of position is a "simple" one. Well the answer to that question you posed is very simple. The teams that beat us had a better standard of player. I just think that playing your best players in their best positions brings out the best performance. Like the building analofy earlier. We are ringing up a plumbing contractor to rewire a house, it's not the best thing to do.
or maybe you're correct and they actually had their right winger in goal, and the goal keeper up front. I never paid that detailed attention to opposition.