Martin Shaw wrote:please keep the discussion about the team, the players, the manager, the club, the ground, etc etc etc, and do not be confrontational about and to other users.
Amber Andy wrote:KirkbyStag2 wrote:Johnny H wrote:The season we got relegated it was certainly not Jason White's fault we went down.
He only played around 14 or 15 games that season and kept 5 or 6 clean sheets.
We were already well doomed when the freak goal went in against Rotherham....and many of the best GK's in the world have conceded goals like that since
If we had drawn 0-0 v Rotherham, instead of losing 0-1 from a goal hit from near the dug outs (Bishop Street side), this would have been the league table,
.................PLD....PTS.....GD
Dag & Red...45......46......-23
Stags..........45......43.....-17
Wrexham....45......37......-34
So a Stags win at Dag & Red on the last day of the season would have been enough for Stags to stay up on goal difference.
That dreadful goal v Rotherham was crucial and was the nail in the coffin.
Spot on. That goal was a gut wrencher, and very significant in our demise.
We would have had a good go at it.The Rotherham game finished us. You are right about Haslam though.Sneag wrote:Amber Andy wrote:KirkbyStag2 wrote:Johnny H wrote:The season we got relegated it was certainly not Jason White's fault we went down.
He only played around 14 or 15 games that season and kept 5 or 6 clean sheets.
We were already well doomed when the freak goal went in against Rotherham....and many of the best GK's in the world have conceded goals like that since
If we had drawn 0-0 v Rotherham, instead of losing 0-1 from a goal hit from near the dug outs (Bishop Street side), this would have been the league table,
.................PLD....PTS.....GD
Dag & Red...45......46......-23
Stags..........45......43.....-17
Wrexham....45......37......-34
So a Stags win at Dag & Red on the last day of the season would have been enough for Stags to stay up on goal difference.
That dreadful goal v Rotherham was crucial and was the nail in the coffin.
Spot on. That goal was a gut wrencher, and very significant in our demise.
We wouldn't have beaten Dagenham.
Painful as relegation was, it lanced the Haslam boil.
broomo wrote:bellwhiff wrote:Tippy Tappy Football wrote:Rollin Menayese should not have been allowed to join Walsall on loan until we had recruited a quality fit replacement. If we still had Rollin in the squad on transfer deadline day then I do not think Nigel Clough would have allowed him to leave the building bearing in mind Richard Nartey was carrying a knock and Will Forrester was injured. Sam Hughes was also injured.
100pc spot on. Wonder what Don Howe will have to say about that.
Can't resist having a little dig can you?
I know who's posts I'd rather read and who's knowledge I trust more.
Hint, it's not yours Parky's or the trolls.
Parkinsons Perm wrote:broomo wrote:bellwhiff wrote:Tippy Tappy Football wrote:Rollin Menayese should not have been allowed to join Walsall on loan until we had recruited a quality fit replacement. If we still had Rollin in the squad on transfer deadline day then I do not think Nigel Clough would have allowed him to leave the building bearing in mind Richard Nartey was carrying a knock and Will Forrester was injured. Sam Hughes was also injured.
100pc spot on. Wonder what Don Howe will have to say about that.
Can't resist having a little dig can you?
I know who's posts I'd rather read and who's knowledge I trust more.
Hint, it's not yours Parky's or the trolls.
So anyone who doesn't join the Nigel love in, you're so predictable.
Sedgwick wrote:Parkinsons Perm wrote:broomo wrote:bellwhiff wrote:Tippy Tappy Football wrote:Rollin Menayese should not have been allowed to join Walsall on loan until we had recruited a quality fit replacement. If we still had Rollin in the squad on transfer deadline day then I do not think Nigel Clough would have allowed him to leave the building bearing in mind Richard Nartey was carrying a knock and Will Forrester was injured. Sam Hughes was also injured.
100pc spot on. Wonder what Don Howe will have to say about that.
Can't resist having a little dig can you?
I know who's posts I'd rather read and who's knowledge I trust more.
Hint, it's not yours Parky's or the trolls.
So anyone who doesn't join the Nigel love in, you're so predictable.
says one of the most repetitive posters.
Got my bingo dauber ready for the "shocking management" tripe again on Saturday.
Martin Shaw wrote:if you're just going to bicker and confront other users, then don't post please.
bellwhiff wrote:broomo wrote:bellwhiff wrote:Tippy Tappy Football wrote:Rollin Menayese should not have been allowed to join Walsall on loan until we had recruited a quality fit replacement. If we still had Rollin in the squad on transfer deadline day then I do not think Nigel Clough would have allowed him to leave the building bearing in mind Richard Nartey was carrying a knock and Will Forrester was injured. Sam Hughes was also injured.
100pc spot on. Wonder what Don Howe will have to say about that.
Can't resist having a little dig can you?
I know who's posts I'd rather read and who's knowledge I trust more.
Hint, it's not yours Parky's or the trolls.
I honestly don’t care what you think, superfan. So why bother telling me?
Don’t you need to get to bed? You’ve got to get up an hour before you go to bed so you can skateboard to Orient and then moon walk back. Legend.
broomo wrote:Martin Shaw wrote:if you're just going to bicker and confront other users, then don't post please.
Sort it out then Martin.
Gaz, Parkinson and Bell are responsible for 90% of the arguments on here. At least one of them is clearly a troll.
Isn't that what you are doing ? Sitting on line, hurling abuse at NC ? Seems that way to me pal. You seem to lack the ability or inclination to post anything remotely positive.Gazmoose82 wrote:broomo wrote:Martin Shaw wrote:if you're just going to bicker and confront other users, then don't post please.
Sort it out then Martin.
Gaz, Parkinson and Bell are responsible for 90% of the arguments on here. At least one of them is clearly a troll.
Like i've said hundreds of times on here... You cannot simply brand someone a troll for having an opinion on something!
A troll is someone who sits on-line all day hurling abuse at somebody... Not someone who thinks Nigel clough has made a complete balls up of managing MTFC and wants to share his opinion.
For Martin to 'sort it out' would mean taking half of stagsnet away!
yorkshire stag wrote:a message board is about discussion & opinions, just because fans don’t agree doesn’t mean they need sorting out, debate your point, enjoy the banter or just block if you can’t stand the heat, however a world of Stagsnet with every fan agreeing is never going to happen!
i enjoy arguing !
broomo wrote:yorkshire stag wrote:a message board is about discussion & opinions, just because fans don’t agree doesn’t mean they need sorting out, debate your point, enjoy the banter or just block if you can’t stand the heat, however a world of Stagsnet with every fan agreeing is never going to happen!
i enjoy arguing !
It's not about agreeing or disagreeing. It's about the constant sniping.
Look at how many times since yesterday Parky or Bellwhiff have called Sedgwick Stagsnets Don Howe. All because he disagrees with their constant whining.
As soon as anyone dares to disagree out come the insults and then folk wonder why arguments start.
They are both like a dog with a bone. It's both childish and annoying.
broomo wrote:yorkshire stag wrote:a message board is about discussion & opinions, just because fans don’t agree doesn’t mean they need sorting out, debate your point, enjoy the banter or just block if you can’t stand the heat, however a world of Stagsnet with every fan agreeing is never going to happen!
i enjoy arguing !
It's not about agreeing or disagreeing. It's about the constant sniping.
Look at how many times since yesterday Parky or Bellwhiff have called Sedgwick Stagsnets Don Howe. All because he disagrees with their constant whining.
As soon as anyone dares to disagree out come the insults and then folk wonder why arguments start.
They are both like a dog with a bone. It's both childish and annoying.
bellwhiff wrote:broomo wrote:yorkshire stag wrote:a message board is about discussion & opinions, just because fans don’t agree doesn’t mean they need sorting out, debate your point, enjoy the banter or just block if you can’t stand the heat, however a world of Stagsnet with every fan agreeing is never going to happen!
i enjoy arguing !
It's not about agreeing or disagreeing. It's about the constant sniping.
Look at how many times since yesterday Parky or Bellwhiff have called Sedgwick Stagsnets Don Howe. All because he disagrees with their constant whining.
As soon as anyone dares to disagree out come the insults and then folk wonder why arguments start.
They are both like a dog with a bone. It's both childish and annoying.
Oh the utter utter irony of that comment. Up you’ve rocked, flounced off at least twice because someone had the temerity to have a different opinion to you and even though you’re not a fan of OUR club, you’re now attempting to dictate to the board moderator what is and isn’t allowed ? Just how big is that ego of yours ?
You might want to consider your own posts sunshine. You castigate me for pushing back and insulting, but you do the exact same thing, just not as well.
Like I said before, you’re just a transit instance. You’re not here for the club. If NC left then you’re off too. Do you kiss the badge too ?
Martin Shaw wrote:if you're just going to bicker and confront other users, then don't post please. Stop now. I've asked enough times now.
bellwhiff wrote:Martin Shaw wrote:if you're just going to bicker and confront other users, then don't post please. Stop now. I've asked enough times now.
That’s fair enough but he just always seems to get the last pop in.
And Broomo, I’m always happy to say hi. I was there last weekend. Why not offer to meet then?
Anyway.
Captain Cunno wrote:Firstly I have no issue with either broomo or bellwhiff I find one informative and one hilarious so fills two needs in my life...
As a side note to this rather amusing back and forth I was wondering , are we the ONLY club in the football league to have not one but two "fans" of the manager but not the club ?
Cant many "fans" of Derek Adams but not Bradford...
Must be a record surely...
Anyway to not upset Martin our defense is Ross Dyer....
I thought so too.part time pete wrote:Captain Cunno wrote:Firstly I have no issue with either broomo or bellwhiff I find one informative and one hilarious so fills two needs in my life...
As a side note to this rather amusing back and forth I was wondering , are we the ONLY club in the football league to have not one but two "fans" of the manager but not the club ?
Cant many "fans" of Derek Adams but not Bradford...
Must be a record surely...
Anyway to not upset Martin our defense is Ross Dyer....
I thought Ross Dyer was very effective in our conference play off season and don’t understand why he is so maligned.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 393 guests