Rob wrote:I think we have a very good budget but I don't think the manager has used much of it. He signed what are probably cheap loan players instead of 1st choice, more expensive permanent ones, I suspect there is plenty in the kitty for January.
Sedgwick wrote:Find it hilarious that no one wants to talk about the budget... because it goes against the idea that we should automatically be top 3 every year.
Look through the squad, its as budget as you can get. We are on a cost cutting exercise and the table/ transfers reflect it perfectly.
Kenwood wrote:I don’t think we have a top 3 budget but we will certainly have a competitive one
I have no idea but how would our budget compare to Harrogate for instance?
The potential signing of Naylor (although I was never convinced he would be a suitable CH, having played a lot of his football as a holding midfielder) shows you NC had a decent budget
Players like Hawkins, Johnson, Oates, Quinn, Macca, Perch, Laps, Clarke, Maris, Bowery will all be on good money at this level
I don’t think he has yet got the balance and type of player in the squad right and that is not just down to budget
BH_Stag wrote:Disagree we are on a cost cutting exercise.
We were willing to make Naylor one of if not the highest paid player ever to play for Mansfield allegedly.
bellwhiff wrote:It’s not about money. It’s about procurement.
Onelove wrote:What's is Sharpe's role in signing players? Seem to have missed a lot of Clough's supposed targets.
Very often the two go together. Money is why we lost out on Naylor. He would have been a good signing, and costly.bellwhiff wrote:It’s not about money. It’s about procurement.
Onelove wrote:What's is Sharpe's role in signing players? Seem to have missed a lot of Clough's supposed targets.
MTFCMusings wrote:Onelove wrote:What's is Sharpe's role in signing players? Seem to have missed a lot of Clough's supposed targets.
He’s the chief exec, so he’s basically in charge of the admin and the negotiation of the details.
It’s true we missed three targets, but two went to League One (one was injured until November anyway) and the other club didn’t want to sell. So other than throw more money at things, which people have criticised in the past, I’m not sure what more he could’ve done.
Sedgwick wrote:Find it hilarious that no one wants to talk about the budget... because it goes against the idea that we should automatically be top 3 every year.
Look through the squad, its as budget as you can get. We are on a cost cutting exercise and the table/ transfers reflect it perfectly.
broomo wrote:bellwhiff wrote:It’s not about money. It’s about procurement.
You keep using the term procurement.
It's not your old job bonny lad.
It's recruitment not procurement.
arsene wengers coat wrote:broomo wrote:bellwhiff wrote:It’s not about money. It’s about procurement.
You keep using the term procurement.
It's not your old job bonny lad.
It's recruitment not procurement.
We don't procure players. They dont return an ITT after 28 days and get it marked by a committee like the MOD, who I might add are one of the worst Departments for procurement.
bellwhiff wrote:arsene wengers coat wrote:broomo wrote:bellwhiff wrote:It’s not about money. It’s about procurement.
You keep using the term procurement.
It's not your old job bonny lad.
It's recruitment not procurement.
We don't procure players. They dont return an ITT after 28 days and get it marked by a committee like the MOD, who I might add are one of the worst Departments for procurement.
I’d say we do. We procure contractors for certain roles and responsibilities.
Procurement
Procurement is often a fancy term used in marketing to find and retrieve something, usually an item or a service. Plenty of businesses have a procurement department which is usually filled with a group of dedicated employees who make buying decisions for the company.
When procurement is implemented in human resources, it becomes an operative function. Chris Emrick, Project Manager at Dematic, defines procurement in human resource as resource gathering, getting the best deal possible for resources. It is concerned with procuring and employing people who possess necessary skill, knowledge and aptitude. Generally, people who have a reputation to do work (via reference or referral) are enough for a contractor to be hired.
For example, if a project needs specialised labour or merely more labour hours than inhouse staff can provide, HR can procure contract labour. When the need for the product or extra labour is done, the resource could be exhausted. In many situations, procurement could be defined as hourly labour with some note.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 224 guests