bear 73 wrote:We are alright for full backs, and 3 central defenders is a fine line, and one more would mean 2 sitting on the bench, last season we had Rawson, Perch, Sweeney and let Menayese go out on loan, Again this season we have let Menayese gp out on loan.
Going with 3 is a tight ship, But he has Hawkins who has played that role, and Bowery is having game time at central defence, and with 6 or 7 attacking players in the squad, he feels there is enough cover
Rob wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:yorkshire stag wrote:Still concerned we are a big commanding CB missing to play along side Fazz, good defending is built on communication & partnerships, the closer we get to the start of the season the less time they will have together to gel is my only worry !!
last price required Cloughie
If we signed one of those, I don’t think he’d be playing alongside Faz.
I agree, NC clearly likes Perch there, hence playing Hewitt at RB when Gordon was injured. I've no problem with the defenders themselves, they are all good footballers, but I do think one more CB is needed for competition and depth.
yorkshire stag wrote:Rob wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:yorkshire stag wrote:Still concerned we are a big commanding CB missing to play along side Fazz, good defending is built on communication & partnerships, the closer we get to the start of the season the less time they will have together to gel is my only worry !!
last price required Cloughie
If we signed one of those, I don’t think he’d be playing alongside Faz.
I agree, NC clearly likes Perch there, hence playing Hewitt at RB when Gordon was injured. I've no problem with the defenders themselves, they are all good footballers, but I do think one more CB is needed for competition and depth.
Perch is not a CB, defensive midfield/right back & great cover as CB however he isn’t & imo shouldn’t be one of our first choice pairings.
In cloughie’s own admission he cannot play a full season, if we don’t sort it & sooner rather then later to give them time to gel this will come back & bite us.
yorkshire stag wrote:Perch is not a CB
Martin Shaw wrote:yorkshire stag wrote:Perch is not a CB
If you were watching last season, you will have seen that he was extremely good in that position, and consistently so.
chip63 wrote:I thought Sweeney and Rawson had the making of an excellent partnership.
Though to me, clearing the ball away anywhere up the pitch is good enough for me.
Cloughs fault wanting it to be cleared to another player and it has to be one of ours too.
chip63 wrote:I thought Sweeney and Rawson had the making of an excellent partnership.
Though to me, clearing the ball away anywhere up the pitch is good enough for me.
Cloughs fault wanting it to be cleared to another player and it has to be one of ours too.
bellwhiff wrote:York’s stamps feet over lack of signing. Who knew
yorkstag wrote:chip63 wrote:I thought Sweeney and Rawson had the making of an excellent partnership.
Though to me, clearing the ball away anywhere up the pitch is good enough for me.
Cloughs fault wanting it to be cleared to another player and it has to be one of ours too.
Watch the debacle at Harrogate and then post again
lifestags wrote:The game we lost?
Dan wrote:Perch played well at the back, he certainly didn't look like a fish out of water there...
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Martin Shaw and 114 guests