I'm curious, why do we need to consolidate? Why is it Flitcroft fault? I'd blame the guy who managed 12th signing 18 million players (slight exaggeration
)
The board have said that budgets haven't changed, so surely keep the guy who finished 4th rather than get rid of him.
It's plain as day. Demps won 3 youth titles in a row as manager of our youth team. There is some merit to that. However they were kids who have one aim to "make it as a pro" and attendances of 1-5% of our home gates. It's a new kettle of fish managing adults who have already "made it as a pro" in attendances of 4000 or so. I'm not saying Dempster had never experienced losing before but 3 league titles suggest there's not many. I barely attended any youth games but at no point did they set up camp in their own penalty area for large portions of the game.
It's not consolidation it's a huge backfire. Consolidation is keeping it the same and not progressing we've regressed and quite badly, in both results and performance levels. That's the pressing issue.
Had we consolidated under Flitcroft (ie results the same) this season we would have enough points and GD to be 2nd right now. Teams behind us will have a game in hand but that means little until they are played.. That's pretty damning in my view.
I'm usually the last person to turn my back on a manager. I'm usually the guy arguing that whoever is in charge should get more time. I did it for holdsworth, Russel, Cox and Murray I dug and dug for arguments for keeping them on. I literally cannot find a case compelling enough to think he is the right man. He's inherited one of the easiest jobs in professional football and can't manage it. He's got a settled squad that performed well last season and turned them into a hoof ball ultra defensive side