Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:In his pre match commentary Martin ran through the teams and stated why other players weren't available. He said Mellis was suspended and that Donohue was unavailable for selection.
Obviously Martin is not a part of the official club set up but it appears that may be the official line.
bellwhiff wrote:Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:In his pre match commentary Martin ran through the teams and stated why other players weren't available. He said Mellis was suspended and that Donohue was unavailable for selection.
Obviously Martin is not a part of the official club set up but it appears that may be the official line.
Martin is too close to the club.
MTFCMusings wrote:Uncle wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Uncle wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:The question is will John Lomas or Jake Garner have the balls to ask any questions?
Questions about what? Matters involving a Police investigation? I assume the only people asking any questions would be Detectives or Solicitors.
Well for the club to acknowledge that something has happened is the first thing, whether investigations are ongoing or not it doesn't change the fact that they were allegedly arrested and have allegedly been suspended. It would seem the obvious thing to do given it's all over social media.
Silly me. I thought John Lomas worked for the CHAD.
What has that got to do with anything?
bellwhiff wrote:Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:In his pre match commentary Martin ran through the teams and stated why other players weren't available. He said Mellis was suspended and that Donohue was unavailable for selection.
Obviously Martin is not a part of the official club set up but it appears that may be the official line.
Martin is too close to the club.
NorthLondonStag wrote:bellwhiff wrote:Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:In his pre match commentary Martin ran through the teams and stated why other players weren't available. He said Mellis was suspended and that Donohue was unavailable for selection.
Obviously Martin is not a part of the official club set up but it appears that may be the official line.
Martin is too close to the club.
He’s not too close to the club. He’s doing a semi-official (or potentially official) commentary where, at this stage, it’s not appropriate for him to comment. He handled it in an appropriate way.
spanishstag wrote:bellwhiff wrote:Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:In his pre match commentary Martin ran through the teams and stated why other players weren't available. He said Mellis was suspended and that Donohue was unavailable for selection.
Obviously Martin is not a part of the official club set up but it appears that may be the official line.
Martin is too close to the club.
You mean he knows more than most whats happening unlike you
bellwhiff wrote:spanishstag wrote:bellwhiff wrote:Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:In his pre match commentary Martin ran through the teams and stated why other players weren't available. He said Mellis was suspended and that Donohue was unavailable for selection.
Obviously Martin is not a part of the official club set up but it appears that may be the official line.
Martin is too close to the club.
You mean he knows more than most whats happening unlike you
What’s that got to do with anything ? Have you been on the cerveza?
Of course he knows more. Why isn’t he commenting on it? Isn’t that what’s commentators do ?
bellwhiff wrote:NorthLondonStag wrote:bellwhiff wrote:Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:In his pre match commentary Martin ran through the teams and stated why other players weren't available. He said Mellis was suspended and that Donohue was unavailable for selection.
Obviously Martin is not a part of the official club set up but it appears that may be the official line.
Martin is too close to the club.
He’s not too close to the club. He’s doing a semi-official (or potentially official) commentary where, at this stage, it’s not appropriate for him to comment. He handled it in an appropriate way.
Rubbish. Two players were arrested. They’ve apparently been suspended. You think that’s not newsworthy or even likely to be commented upon ? Is there a law of Omertà?
BELSE wrote:not having a go at you Martin but some one at the match spoke to us and said it was bad news and JR and CR and the later not
happy but i do think the the club will say what is going to do as one as done is ban.And it was johns brother-in -law.
BELSE wrote:not having a go at you Martin but some one at the match spoke to us and said it was bad news and JR and CR and the later not
happy but i do think the the club will say what is going to do as one as done is ban.And it was johns brother-in -law.
bellwhiff wrote:NorthLondonStag wrote:bellwhiff wrote:Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:In his pre match commentary Martin ran through the teams and stated why other players weren't available. He said Mellis was suspended and that Donohue was unavailable for selection.
Obviously Martin is not a part of the official club set up but it appears that may be the official line.
Martin is too close to the club.
He’s not too close to the club. He’s doing a semi-official (or potentially official) commentary where, at this stage, it’s not appropriate for him to comment. He handled it in an appropriate way.
Rubbish. Two players were arrested. They’ve apparently been suspended. You think that’s not newsworthy or even likely to be commented upon ? Is there a law of Omertà?
Uncle wrote:BELSE wrote:not having a go at you Martin but some one at the match spoke to us and said it was bad news and JR and CR and the later not
happy but i do think the the club will say what is going to do as one as done is ban.And it was johns brother-in -law.
When John's brother in law said it, was it more comprehensible than what you've written.
EdwinstoweStag wrote:
Given the choice:
Martin’s dedication, or
Bellwhiff’s snide ?
Wonder what would get more votes?
NorthLondonStag wrote:bellwhiff wrote:NorthLondonStag wrote:bellwhiff wrote:Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:In his pre match commentary Martin ran through the teams and stated why other players weren't available. He said Mellis was suspended and that Donohue was unavailable for selection.
Obviously Martin is not a part of the official club set up but it appears that may be the official line.
Martin is too close to the club.
He’s not too close to the club. He’s doing a semi-official (or potentially official) commentary where, at this stage, it’s not appropriate for him to comment. He handled it in an appropriate way.
Rubbish. Two players were arrested. They’ve apparently been suspended. You think that’s not newsworthy or even likely to be commented upon ? Is there a law of Omertà?
1. The police haven’t named anyone who has been arrested, as far as I am aware.
2. Speculation is therefore inappropriate.
3. Martin is there to comment on a football game on an open subscriber basis. He’s not there to report arrests, based on speculation, or to state the club’s position on matters such as this.
4. It would not be helpful to anyone for Martin or Dean to engage in what may be Ill informed speculation on legal and potentially criminal matters.
bellwhiff wrote:spanishstag wrote:bellwhiff wrote:Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:In his pre match commentary Martin ran through the teams and stated why other players weren't available. He said Mellis was suspended and that Donohue was unavailable for selection.
Obviously Martin is not a part of the official club set up but it appears that may be the official line.
Martin is too close to the club.
You mean he knows more than most whats happening unlike you
What’s that got to do with anything ? Have you been on the cerveza?
Of course he knows more. Why isn’t he commenting on it? Isn’t that what’s commentators do ?
spanishstag wrote:bellwhiff wrote:spanishstag wrote:bellwhiff wrote:Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:In his pre match commentary Martin ran through the teams and stated why other players weren't available. He said Mellis was suspended and that Donohue was unavailable for selection.
Obviously Martin is not a part of the official club set up but it appears that may be the official line.
Martin is too close to the club.
You mean he knows more than most whats happening unlike you
What’s that got to do with anything ? Have you been on the cerveza?
Of course he knows more. Why isn’t he commenting on it? Isn’t that what’s commentators do ?
Well sometimes its not appropriate to comment ,but as every one on here knows ,you dont seem to get that
NorthLondonStag wrote:Bellwhiff, earlier on you were saying we had to wait for evidence before denouncing the alleged culprits (as it happens I agree with you). You were very keen on ‘due process’ running its course.
Now you seem to be saying that Martin should have named them on a live commentary feed.
You might appreciate why I am struggling to reconcile these two approaches. Perhaps you could explain?
lifestags wrote:Just happens to be more recent since we put 2 bad apples together with Dion.
It's a lack of respect for the manger to me. Same with the the sending offs they aren't worried about the managers opinion.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Frankenstag and 115 guests