Big yella wrote:Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:HitchcocksShins wrote:
At the end of the day, unless you take a large sample of male and female children and give them exactly the same training and opportunities to progress it will be pure speculation as to which sex is better suited to the game.
I have to disagree mate. Take athletics, Jess Ennis has had all the advantages that men and modern training and equipment can bring, yet she still ran slower, threw less distance and jumped less distance and height than Daley Thompson did 40 years previously.
Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:Big yella wrote:Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:HitchcocksShins wrote:
At the end of the day, unless you take a large sample of male and female children and give them exactly the same training and opportunities to progress it will be pure speculation as to which sex is better suited to the game.
I have to disagree mate. Take athletics, Jess Ennis has had all the advantages that men and modern training and equipment can bring, yet she still ran slower, threw less distance and jumped less distance and height than Daley Thompson did 40 years previously.
Poor example Craig as that is an individual and football is a team game. Additionally it's not about individual disciplines but how you use those disciplines in a combined manner to achieve an objective.
ST4GS wrote:Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:Big yella wrote:Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:HitchcocksShins wrote:
At the end of the day, unless you take a large sample of male and female children and give them exactly the same training and opportunities to progress it will be pure speculation as to which sex is better suited to the game.
I have to disagree mate. Take athletics, Jess Ennis has had all the advantages that men and modern training and equipment can bring, yet she still ran slower, threw less distance and jumped less distance and height than Daley Thompson did 40 years previously.
Poor example Craig as that is an individual and football is a team game. Additionally it's not about individual disciplines but how you use those disciplines in a combined manner to achieve an objective.
Someone once told me Paula Radcliffe in 2003 ran the London Marathon in a world leading time for women (never been bettered since) and the leading British male in that race ran slower? Not sure if this is a myth or not?
Captain Cunno wrote:Women are more than welcome to post on here as long as the tea is cooked and the ironing up to date.
scotsstag wrote:Bloody annoying that about every game from this womens football is on the telly BUT we're hosting the Cricket World Cup in this country plus have a damn good chance of actually winning it and all we get is a few highlights late on CH5.
Be the same when Wimbledon tennis starts, can't switch the telly on for fear of seeing it.
Rant over.
Dan wrote:scotsstag wrote:Bloody annoying that about every game from this womens football is on the telly BUT we're hosting the Cricket World Cup in this country plus have a damn good chance of actually winning it and all we get is a few highlights late on CH5.
Be the same when Wimbledon tennis starts, can't switch the telly on for fear of seeing it.
Rant over.
Thing is though mate is that football & tennis are proper sports whereas cricket isn't...
Rob wrote:Dan wrote:scotsstag wrote:Bloody annoying that about every game from this womens football is on the telly BUT we're hosting the Cricket World Cup in this country plus have a damn good chance of actually winning it and all we get is a few highlights late on CH5.
Be the same when Wimbledon tennis starts, can't switch the telly on for fear of seeing it.
Rant over.
Thing is though mate is that football & tennis are proper sports whereas cricket isn't...
Gonna punch you in the face next time I see you
I love women's football and am enjoying the World Cup. Far less diving and cheating. I've reffed women's footy for about a decade now, it's getting better every year.
The One wrote:Man of the Match, Whats that about ?
RudyDude wrote:In the early 70s, my wife used to organise and play in a women's team that played supposed 'friendly' charity matches against men's teams to raise funds for a local cancer charity and a local hospice. The rules and refereeing were always rigged to enable the women to win and they always played like animals to the delight of the hordes of baying, laughing females who came to watch. A lot of blokes refused to play against them rather than suffer the inevitable humiliation and possible injury.
She also ran a charity mixed hockey team which I played in as well and the women were equally vicious in that but we had to pack that in after her response to some terrible sexism against her. She was playing in goal and a bloke asked her if she would like him to rub his stick on her breasts so she hit him over the head and kicked him in the nuts as he laid on the floor. We were playing at Rampton Hospital. The game was abandoned.
She sadly died 30 years later in the hospice for which she raised so much money.
Johnny Rotten wrote:I've watched a few women's games including top sides in England and two champions league finals (the latter held in England circa 7-8yrs ago).
The French side Lyon were/are immense and most of them (still) play for the France national side. The Germans also pretty handy (Wolfsburg and the great named Turbine Pottsdam!)
At the time the English sides were well adrift ability-wise but obviously times change and our national League(s) and side are thus improving.
It's hugely refreshing watching players not diving, remonstrating with officials and 'cheating'/gaining an advantage unlike their male counterparts.
As stated earlier in the thread the gulf though from the better sides to weaker ones is significant not just in ability but fitness levels.
I've previously posted on here about the recent BBC series following West Ham with Sullivan's son owning the side and that was interesting to see how the top league in England has been developing.
The fact that in England and our own FA not recognising or allowing women to play the game until in 'recent' years naturally puts them well behind the men's game plus attendance figures and investment/sponsorship inevitably falls well behind and nowhere near commensurate.
Dan wrote:scotsstag wrote:Bloody annoying that about every game from this womens football is on the telly BUT we're hosting the Cricket World Cup in this country plus have a damn good chance of actually winning it and all we get is a few highlights late on CH5.
Be the same when Wimbledon tennis starts, can't switch the telly on for fear of seeing it.
Rant over.
Thing is though mate is that football & tennis are proper sports whereas cricket isn't...
RudyDude wrote:RudyDude wrote:In the early 70s, my wife used to organise and play in a women's team that played supposed 'friendly' charity matches against men's teams to raise funds for a local cancer charity and a local hospice. The rules and refereeing were always rigged to enable the women to win and they always played like animals to the delight of the hordes of baying, laughing females who came to watch. A lot of blokes refused to play against them rather than suffer the inevitable humiliation and possible injury.
She also ran a charity mixed hockey team which I played in as well and the women were equally vicious in that but we had to pack that in after her response to some terrible sexism against her. She was playing in goal and a bloke asked her if she would like him to rub his stick on her breasts so she hit him over the head and kicked him in the nuts as he laid on the floor. We were playing at Rampton Hospital. The game was abandoned.
It’s a pity women’s football wasn’t taken seriously in the 70s
She sadly died 30 years later in the hospice for which she raised so much money.
I deliberately withheld the significant point about the women's football team that I described above.
They wanted to play 'proper football' against other women's teams but a combination of the lack of other local women's teams, sexist attitudes to them by both the football authorities and male football teams and fans and the resulting fear of ridicule by men, meant they could not play official, authorised matches and official referees could not officiate.
Their only option was to play what they and spectators saw as 'comedy matches' but they were committed players and fans, several of whom were regulars at Stags matches, my wife, in particular.
And to listen to some people who pour scorn on them, there is still some way to go to their acceptance.
Old timer wrote:As for VAR I would rather have crap refs
cerfjaune wrote:Old timer wrote:As for VAR I would rather have crap refs
That’s certainly what we’re going to get in League 2 again this season.
I don’t think we’ll ever get VAR at our level.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Beyond The Pale, Bing [Bot], Cardiffstag23, Chrisuknottm, DAVE H, kieranbenton, PEAR CIDER, Rob, Roger_Sausage, Upper West, yellowstagsfan and 166 guests