gazza1988 wrote:
"Only one reason we leave with nothing. It's because of the decisions made by the referee all afternoon. Nothing else"
gazza1988 wrote:
"Only one reason we leave with nothing. It's because of the decisions made by the referee all afternoon. Nothing else"
bigalstag1 wrote:In 53 years I've never ever come away from a game feeling as cheated, as I did today. The players put in a mammoth effort, especially in that second half, to be robbed, by a referee, who had no intention of letting the Stags get anything out of that game. A more blatant penalty you will not see., and he couldn't bring the red card out fast enough, to send Bowery, off.
Anybody that criticises anybody today, needs to give there head a good shake.
P.s. thought the fans were superb today, in spite of everything.
MansfieldMick wrote:How come we never come away from a game saying we got a dodgy penalty decision and their sending off was a bit cruel, why do all the big decisions always go against us? Stops being coincidence after a while. FA really do need to look at some of the refereeing at our level, it's starting to spoil the whole experience for me.
Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:I can’t see us getting anywhere with our complaint.
Bowery’s red and the penalty are matters of opinion and the FA will always back the ref.
I can see Garner getting a reasonably long ban for his confrontation with the spectators maybe as many as four matches. As Sneag says, it’s also possible Nigel will be charged for his interview which could also involve a touch line ban.
I still think we should go ahead with the complaint but it should be a decision made by JR as the others were too involved to be totally focused on the correct course of action and it’s implications for the club.
Rob wrote:I've never been taken in by the love in for Wimbledon, in fact, I've always disliked them and don't subscribe to the poor hard done to me syndrome from the move to MK - it was their owner who removed the covenant on Plough Lane and sold it to a supermarket, it was living above their means that led to their financial issues that resulted in the move. Then you look at how they treated Kingstonian and how they profited from Kingsmeadow by selling it to Chelsea knowing they would not allow the club who built the ground to play there. raspberries.
gazza1988 wrote:
"Only one reason we leave with nothing. It's because of the decisions made by the referee all afternoon. Nothing else"
Amber Andy wrote:arsene wengers coat wrote:That feels so unfair.
We take the moral victory though.
Means nothing unfortunately.
Marky Mark wrote:gazza1988 wrote:
"Only one reason we leave with nothing. It's because of the decisions made by the referee all afternoon. Nothing else"
Dan wrote:I've not read the thread yet so apologies if this has already been posted.
oldweststander wrote:Marky Mark wrote:gazza1988 wrote:
"Only one reason we leave with nothing. It's because of the decisions made by the referee all afternoon. Nothing else"
You can see how absolutely fizzing he is about all of it. Proud that he’s our manager
I have had a look, whereby for the sending off, the attacker was mid-way into the defensive half, on direct route to goal & much space beyond the defender so can see why he sent defender off.
As to the penalty, the Referee had much the same view as the tv camera by looking ‘towards’ the incident, whereby he would have been better placed getting more a side-on view. I think there was contact from the Home defender, though the probable reason why he didn’t give it, is that the Mansfield player went to ground a bit too easily, which always places doubt into the mind of a Referee. He may have also decided that the contact was minimal & therefore not sufficient. If there is any doubt, then a Referee is not likely to give a pen (though we all know some soft ones are given).
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: bacs, Bros, Costastag, Paulstag, St Hilary Stag, Tippy Tappy Football, Tomwh, yellowstagsfan, yorkshire stag and 448 guests