HitchcocksShins wrote:Alternative Sponsor: basic grammar mistakes
The One wrote:HitchcocksShins wrote:Alternative Sponsor: basic grammar mistakes
Do you have to criticise every fred?
they're joint 2nd highest scorers too.Spiritater wrote:Swindon seem porous at the back, we should enhance our goal difference shouldn't we?
gazza1988 wrote:Next thread should be sponsored by the vomiting stag and his great grammar.
arsene wengers coat wrote:https://footballleagueworld.co.uk/mansfield-town-have-one-strength-that-wrexham-and-notts-county-dont-right-now-view/
Another good article.
HitchcocksShins wrote:The One wrote:HitchcocksShins wrote:Alternative Sponsor: basic grammar mistakes
Do you have to criticise every fred?
Nope, just the ones with basic typing errors.
So, yes then
chimneyboy wrote:there is nothing wrong with oxford commas but consistency is key.
swindon 1 stags 1
Sneag wrote:chimneyboy wrote:there is nothing wrong with oxford commas but consistency is key.
swindon 1 stags 1
I prefer the Cambridge colon:
Got a bad feeling about this one, I'd be delighted with a point.
Cleveland_Stag wrote:Sneag wrote:chimneyboy wrote:there is nothing wrong with oxford commas but consistency is key.
swindon 1 stags 1
I prefer the Cambridge colon:
Got a bad feeling about this one, I'd be delighted with a point.
Surely can’t be delighted with a point tomorrow! These have 2 points from their last 6 league games, with a 7-4 home loss to Aldershot in the FA Cup in the middle of that run too. We’re a better side away from home than we are at home too. Swindon do have some talented attacking players for sure, but considering our league form and Swindon’s league form, we should be looking at this game as being very, very winnable. Of course, a draw wouldn’t be terrible though.
Amberheart wrote:Swindon 2 - Stags 3
We march on
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Clockworktarzan, northern stag, Nutty Stag, Scothie the Stag, ST4GS, StanstedStag, Tippy Tappy Football and 409 guests