Rob wrote:adamstag wrote:Rob wrote:Billy the fish wrote:So your suggesting Rob we aren’t good enough in the final third with all the investment Radford has afforded DF ??
Today we weren't good enough in the final 3rd, that's down to the players, that apart, not much between the teams.
Adam is outdoing himself with the scale of his over-reaction I don't think he knows we had 57% possession and more attempts on target, but hey, they're just facts.
Pea rollers from 20 yards don’t count, really. Their keeper made a good save to the left after 15 minutes and afterward was largely untroubled.
Don’t let the fact they scored 2 to our 1 and hit the post twice to our none while never looking like conceding an equaliser confuse you though
57% possession means squat, what did we do with it. Ah yeah, the above
Don’t let that get in the way of your “facts” though. I hope we don’t have future games using your “facts”
Not my facts Adam, just facts. You are the master of over reaction and have celebrated our clubs defeats in the past, I suspect you are again quite pleased we lost today, gives you some ammo against our manager. Pathetic really.
yaxhamstag wrote:Is adam becoming the new bellwhiff...
pemill wrote:A 2-1 scoreline suggests we were in the game, could we have sneaked a draw, yes we could but that would have been another draw.
Quite simply the international break didn't do us any favours, we looked rusty, add to that the odd formation made to a disappointing result but by no way were we outplayed. Exeter looked OK but did their usually methods to break up the game.
When Rose came on we were well back in the game, if he can't manage 90 minutes then he should start and be replaced after 60 minutes or so, if he can't manage that then he must be seriously unfit. Where was Davies? I've haven't read anything to suggest he was injured.
Whilst Walker scored he offers very little, not a game changer - he appears to be the first name on the team sheet regardless.
Onwards to Cambridge, to make this right I think a convincing performance and scoreline is a must.
adamstag wrote:There does seem to be this rumour that Walker has to start so many games a season or play a percentage of them, and yesterday does raise that question again.
You simply wouldn’t play 1 upfront at home in yesterday’s circumstances, it was baffling - but if you were going to you’d start with rose or Davies - though the latter was injured.
Only improved when we rightfully went to 2 upfront after 55 odd minutes.
pemill wrote:Where was Davies? I've haven't read anything to suggest he was injured.
jacobs mouse wrote:Mid table written all over this side.From the manager down to the players we just arn't good enough.very frustrating considering how much money and faith JR has put us.
Sedgwick wrote:I said better teams would find space down the channels if were playing 352..... it needs scrapping because our "wingbacks" are no where near good enough for it.
abc wrote:Sedgwick wrote:I said better teams would find space down the channels if were playing 352..... it needs scrapping because our "wingbacks" are no where near good enough for it.
True but how will Flipflop fit his pal Khan in to a 442 ?
MTFCMusings wrote:abc wrote:Sedgwick wrote:I said better teams would find space down the channels if were playing 352..... it needs scrapping because our "wingbacks" are no where near good enough for it.
True but how will Flipflop fit his pal Khan in to a 442 ?
Why are you saying 'his pal' like he hasn't been our most effective player so far this season? He's one of the best players in the league for crying out loud and already a couple of posters on here are trying to hound him out. Unbelievable.
abc wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:abc wrote:Sedgwick wrote:I said better teams would find space down the channels if were playing 352..... it needs scrapping because our "wingbacks" are no where near good enough for it.
True but how will Flipflop fit his pal Khan in to a 442 ?
Why are you saying 'his pal' like he hasn't been our most effective player so far this season? He's one of the best players in the league for crying out loud and already a couple of posters on here are trying to hound him out. Unbelievable.
Most effective ? He's decent on the ball but because he's got no pace and can't tackle he has to play in the hole and is a luxury at times.
abc wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:abc wrote:Sedgwick wrote:I said better teams would find space down the channels if were playing 352..... it needs scrapping because our "wingbacks" are no where near good enough for it.
True but how will Flipflop fit his pal Khan in to a 442 ?
Why are you saying 'his pal' like he hasn't been our most effective player so far this season? He's one of the best players in the league for crying out loud and already a couple of posters on here are trying to hound him out. Unbelievable.
Most effective ? He's decent on the ball but because he's got no pace and can't tackle he has to play in the hole and is a luxury at times.
Amber Andy wrote:abc wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:abc wrote:Sedgwick wrote:I said better teams would find space down the channels if were playing 352..... it needs scrapping because our "wingbacks" are no where near good enough for it.
True but how will Flipflop fit his pal Khan in to a 442 ?
Why are you saying 'his pal' like he hasn't been our most effective player so far this season? He's one of the best players in the league for crying out loud and already a couple of posters on here are trying to hound him out. Unbelievable.
Most effective ? He's decent on the ball but because he's got no pace and can't tackle he has to play in the hole and is a luxury at times.
abc, you are so far off kilter with Khan, it makes me seriously wonder if you attend games.
I will add it wasn't Khan at his best yesterday, but he would be a regular in 90% of teams in our league.
Amber Andy wrote:abc wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:abc wrote:Sedgwick wrote:I said better teams would find space down the channels if were playing 352..... it needs scrapping because our "wingbacks" are no where near good enough for it.
True but how will Flipflop fit his pal Khan in to a 442 ?
Why are you saying 'his pal' like he hasn't been our most effective player so far this season? He's one of the best players in the league for crying out loud and already a couple of posters on here are trying to hound him out. Unbelievable.
Most effective ? He's decent on the ball but because he's got no pace and can't tackle he has to play in the hole and is a luxury at times.
abc, you are so far off kilter with Khan, it makes me seriously wonder if you attend games.
I will add it wasn't Khan at his best yesterday, but he would be a regular in 90% of teams in our league.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Cleveland_Stag, jay-mans, JPT, Scothie the Stag, Stagstown, Tomwh and 178 guests