Richard Cranium wrote:Both?
Dan wrote:Surely, in a RESULTS BASED INDUSTRY, it's 100% results and 0% entertainment (& anything else is a bonus)?
I also don't think you can judge it really.
Say for example you asked 25 people leaving the Mill on Tuesday night to give a % of these, you would get quite a few different answers. So for one person, they might say they really enjoyed the game on Tuesday night yet another might say it was crap, so their answers would be different.
Spiritater wrote:Results. 46 boring 1-0 wins would do me fine thank you.
Sharp wrote:I will never understand why positive, entertaining football equates to poor results. Everyone just seems to assume that if we actually start to even think about entertaining the fans, then the conference beckons. I can't work out why, as from what I've seen if this league, a team who gets it down plays football and entertains would put most opponents to the sword.
mattstag14 wrote:Sharp wrote:I will never understand why positive, entertaining football equates to poor results. Everyone just seems to assume that if we actually start to even think about entertaining the fans, then the conference beckons. I can't work out why, as from what I've seen if this league, a team who gets it down plays football and entertains would put most opponents to the sword.
Nobodies saying entertainment will bring poor results it's just that any die hard fan would definitely take the result over being entertained. I'd love to say wow that was fantastic to watch and we deserved the 3 points but I'm more than happy with the 3 points. Footballs all about winning if we get entertainment as well then that's a bonus.
Sneag wrote:
We've had 3 years of good results (mostly) and I've been bored out of my skull for most of it.
pete wrote:Spiritater wrote:Results. 46 boring 1-0 wins would do me fine thank you.
totally agree
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: 88STAG, BH_Stag, bmthstag, Cleveland_Stag, grufti, lifestags, northstandstag, Sneag and 115 guests